Project On Revolt Of 1857 2g5j2u

PROJECT WORK ON REVOLT OF 1857

REVOLT OF 1857: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES

SUBMITTED TO:

SUBMITTED BY:

MR. RABINDRA PATHAK

RAI NISSEEM KRISHNA

FACULTY

ROLL NO. – 179

HISTORY-1

B.A. (HONS.) L.L.B (HONS.) 3RD SEMESTER

NUSRL, RANCHI

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF STUDY AND RESEARCH IN LAW, RANCHI 2012-2017

1

CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 Causes of the Revolt...…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Economic Causes………………………………………………………………………………………………………………4-5 Political Causes………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….5-6 istrative Causes………………………………………………………………………………………………………6-7 Social and religious Causes……………………………………………………………………….......................7-8 Military Causes………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..8-9 Reasons for the failure of Revolt ………………………………………………………………….…………….10-11

Consequences of the Revolt……………………….................................................................12-14 Conclusion.....................................................................................................................15-16

2

INTRODUCTION The Rebellion of 1857 (also known as the Indian Mutiny) was a watershed event in the history of British India. It was by far the largest, most widespread, and dangerous threat to British rule in India in the nineteenth century1 following the Battle of Plassey in 1757 and Battle of Buxar in 1764. British Empire, being economically exploitative and destructive in the social fabric, encountered resistance right from the beginning. There were innumerable peasant revolts which broke out in different parts of the country. But the most important of all the revolts was the Revolt of 1857. British historians called it a “Sepoy Mutiny” and the Indian historians called it “The First war of Independence”. Jawaharlal Nehru, in his book “Discovery of India” has described it as the “Great revolt of 1857” and added that “it was much more than a military mutiny and it rapidly spread and assumed the character of a popular rebellion and a war of Indian Independence”2. V.D. Sarvakar in his book “The Indian War of Independence, 1857” has also described this incident as “First war of Independence” which has been ed by people like Dr. S.N.Sen, Tarachand and Ashok Mehta. The Revolt has also been described as a "religious war against the Christians', "racial struggle for supremacy between the Black and White", "a struggle between Oriental and Occidental civilisation and culture" and a "HinduMuslim conspiracy to overthrow the British rule". The History of the Indian Mutiny and its subtitle is significant „giving detailed of the sepoy insurrection in India; and a consice history of the great military events which have tendend to consolidate British Empire in Hindostan’3

In this project, I will be examining the various causes of the Revolt of 1857. Then I will proceed to examine the various reasons for the failure of the Revolt. And finally, I will conclude the project by providing an insight on the consequences of this Revolt.

1

T. A. Heathcote, The Military in British India: The Development of British Land Forces in South Asia, 1600-1947 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995), 103; Bernard Porter, The Lion's Share: A Short History of British Imperialism (London: Longman, 1975), 28 2 Nehru Jawaharlal, Discovery of India (1946). O.U.P. (1985), Pg.323 3 L.J. Rosie, The Great Uprising in India, 1857-58(Supernova Publishers), pg. 3

3

CAUSES OF THE REVOLT It was earlier believed that the main reason for the Revolt was the discontent of the Sepoys. But this is no more accepted reason. The Indian public had been suffering under an oppressive foreign rule for almost a century and the revolt of 1857 which broke out in a sudden and spontaneous manner had deeper reasons which are considered to be equally important. They are: i.

ECONOMIC CAUSES:

The most important cause of popular discontent was the British policy of economically exploiting India. This affected all sections of the society. The main economic reasons for the Revolt were:  During 16th and 17th centuries, the activities of East India Company were confined to trade and commerce and had no political intentions. The Indian goods became very popular in Britain and British Government had to a law in 1720, forbidding the use of Indian textiles in Britain. But the whole scenario changed after the Industrial revolution. Because of the reduction in demand of Indian textiles, the local handloom industry suffered heavy loss and suffered badly. The poor Indian weavers could not compete with the machine made goods imported from England. Moreover, the Company bought all the best quality cotton from Indian markets through their political resources and left no scope for the Indian weavers to produce good quality products. Gradually the Indian handicraft industries died. Annexation of Indian states by the company led to cut off of the major source of patronage from the native Princes. Cruel exploitation of the economic resources caused periodic famines which added to the misery of the people. Naturally, a kind of hatred and therefore, a rebel attitude towards the British developed.  Heavy taxation and highly unpopular revenue settlement pauperized the conditions of the peasantry class of the Indian society. As a result, peasants started taking loans from moneylenders/traders at very high rates which often resulted in eviction of the former on non-payment of the debt dues. These moneylenders and traders emerged as the new 4

landlords, while the curse of indebtness plagued the Indian peasantry. So, revenue policies of the British East India Company destroyed the traditional economic fabric of the Indian society. E.g. Permanent Settlement (1793); Ryotwari Settlement (1820). . The precedent for this system of conquer-and-tax had been set by the infamous duo of Clive and Hastings in the late eighteenth century, and had persisted into the early nineteenth century under the name 'Home Charges'-essentially the drain of wealth from India to Britain in the form of bullion and bills to cover trade deficits to India and China 4 . Marxist historian (Eric Stokes, in The Peasant Armed, the Indian Revolt of 1857) saw the uprising as a popular peasant revolt, almost inevitable in fact as the British had destroyed the „social organism‟ of Indian Society by the introduction of steam engine and free trade5.  The British Land revenue settlements increased commercialization of agriculture i.e. peasants being forced to cultivate cash or commercial crops such as cotton, jute, indigo, opium, sugarcane etc. It is often referred to as coercive cultivation also.  Zamindars, the traditional landed aristocracy, were often forfeited of their land rights with frequent use of quo warranto by the istration. Having lost their status, these dispossessed Taluqdars, in order to regain their land rights, grabbed the opportunity presented by the Sepoy revolt to oppose the British.  Gradual disappearance of many states also deprived those Indians who held cilvil and judicial posts in the states, of their jobs. Even religious preachers were divested of their livelihood with the extinction of their native kingdoms. The people who were affected rose against British.

ii.

POLITICAL CAUSES:

The main political causes for the outbreak of the Revolt of 1857 were:  Lord Dalhousie‟s policy of annexation caused an uproar among the people of India. The last Peshwa, Baji Rao‟s adopted son Nana Sahib was deprieved of the pension 4 5

C.A. Bayley Indian Society and the Making of the British Empire (Cambridge 1988) p. 116 Stokes, Eric. The Peasant Armed: The Indian Revolt of 1857. Oxford, 1986

5

his father was receiving. Rani Laxmi Bai‟s adopted son was not given the throne after the death of his father. To make matters worse Lord Dalhousie announced in 1849 that Bahadur Shah Zafar will not be allowed to stay in the Red Fort anymore and they were compelled to move to a place near Qutub MInar. To further worsen the situation Lord Canning announced in 1856 that with the demise of Bahadur Shah Zafar, his successor will not be allowed to use the title “king”.  The annexation of Oudh without a reason led to a huge uprising. The proposal of taking away the title from the Mughal emperor shocked the Muslims. The annexation of Jhansi and Nagpur shocked Hindus as they were predominantly Hindu states. The remaining Hindus and Muslims who were unaffected became insecure; less they meet the same fate.  The myth about the superiority of the British was shattered when they were badly beaten in the first Afghan War. They were again humbled in 1855-56, when they had to face the rebellion of the Santhal tribe of Bengal and Bihar. This proved that the Indian army was quite powerful.  There was a rumour floated around that with the end of the Revolt of 1857 the British Raj would come to an end. This rumour emanated from the fact that the battle of Plassey in 1757 brought about British power and with 1857 a century would be completed which will mark the end of British rule. iii.

ISTRATIVE CAUSES:  Racial overtones and a superiority complex characterized the British istrative attitude towards the native Indian population. British actively followed the policy of discrimination against the Indians. All high posts in the company‟s government were reserved for the Europeans.  Rampant corruption in the company‟s istration, especially among the police, petty officials and lower law courts, and the absentee sovereigntyship character of British rule imparted a foreign and alien look to it in the eyes of Indians. 6

 The istrative machinery of the East India Company was highly inefficient and inadequate. This is clear from the fact that their revenue policies were widely resented.

iv.

SOCIAL AND RELIGIOUS CAUSES:

The social and religious causes also played a very important role in the outbreak of the revolt. The main social and religious causes were:  From the early decades of 19th century, British had abandoned its policy of noninterference in the socio-religious life of the Indians. Abolition of Sati in 1829 under Lord Bentinck, the Hindu Widow Remarriage Act of 1856, and women education all led to disruption in the social world of the people of Indian society.  The construction of the railway and telegraph lines was also resented by the people. The introduction of railways was resented on the grounds that people of all castes will have to travel on same compartments.  Indian people had a fear that the British government was determined to destroy their religion and convert Indians to Christianity under the new regime. The increasing activities of the Christian missionaries and the actual conversions made by them were taken as a proof of this fear. Their vulgar attacks on Hinduism and Islam and centuries old tradition and customs under police protection angered the people. Britishers also established Chapels and Churches for propagating Christianity at the expense of the government. Even the civil and military officers were asked to propagate to gospel. They looked upon foreign innovations as something designed to break down the social order to which they were accustomed and which they considered sacred.  The fear of interference in the social and religious domains of Indian society by outsiders were further compounded by the government‟s decision to tax mosque and temple lands and legislative measures such as Religious Disabilities Act (1856), which modified 7

Hindu customs, for instance declaring that a change of religion did not debar a son from inheriting the property of his heathen father.  The educated Indians were also denied High Posts. The highest office open to an Indian in Civil Services was that of a Sadar or an Amim with an annual salary of Rs. 500 only. In the military service the highest office that an Indian could secure is that of a Subedar. This racial discrimination hurt Indian sentiments tremendously.

v.

MILITARY CAUSES:

 Bengal Army had high proportions of high caste men recruited from North-West provinces and Awadh, Bhumihar Brahmins and Rajputs of the Ganges Valley. In the early years of the Company rule, the British tolerated the caste privileges and customs within the Bengal Army. But by 1820s, these customs and privileges were threatened by the modernizing forces and thus, the conditions of service in the company‟s army and cantonments increasingly came into conflict with the religious beliefs and prejudices of the sepoys. For e.g. Restrictions were on Caste and sectarian marks, growing of beard, Wearing turbans etc.  To the religious Hindu of the time, crossing the sea meant loss of caste. This clashed with the need to defend the growing British Empire outside India. In 1856 Lord Canning‟s Government ed the General Service Enlistment Act (1856) which compelled the sepoys to serve abroad if required by the company.

 The Indian sepoy was equally unhappy with his emoluments compared to his British counterparts. A more immediate cause of the sepoy‟s dissatisfaction was the order that they would not be given the Foreign Service allowance (bhatta) when serving outside their own regions. This affected the extra pay of the sepoys. But the English soldiers in the Indian Army continued to receive this allowance. Also, the Indian sepoys were discriminated against in of promotion and salary. While the sepoys outnumbered 8

the European soldiers, the former were not promoted to higher posts in the Army. The Indian sepoy was made to feel subordinates at every step and was discriminated against racially and in matters of promotion and privileges.  The reports about mixing of bone dust in „atta‟ and the introduction of the Enfield rifle enhanced the sepoy‟s growing disaffection with the Government. The new rifles used cartridges greased with cow and pig fat that would sully the Hindu and Muslim sepoys if they were required to bite the cartridge to load their guns6. The Sahibs at Calcutta [ the Governor General and Council] issued an order to the effect that the main aim behind the distribution of the cartridges was to Christianise the Indian Army, for once the soldiers convert to Christianity, it will not take long to convert the common people, and the fat of pigs and cows was rubbed on the cartridges. This became known through one of the Bengali who was employed in the cartridge- making establishment.7

 The 1857 Revolt began on 29th March 1857 when Mangal Pandey of the 34th infantry in Barrackpore became the first martyr. The mutiny spread rapidly in eastern and northern India. Dehri, Patna, Arrah, Azamgarh, Allahabad, Gorakhpur, Faizabad, Fatehpur, Jhansi, Lucknow, Kanpur, Etawah, Fategarh, Gwalior, Shahjahanpur, Agra, Bharatpur, Rohilkhand, Mathura, Agra, Hatras, Delhi, Meerut, Bareilly and Roorki –these emerged as storm-centres of the Revolt. On 11th May 1857 the sepoys of the Meerut regiment captured Delhi and proclaimed the last Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar as their undisputed leader. As a matter of fact, despite their class contradictions the zamindars, the peasants and artisans ed hands with the sepoys to fight their common enemy – the English. According to one estimate one-fifth of the Indian population in 1857 directly or indirectly participated in the Revolt.

6

Barbara D. Metcalf and Thomas R. Metcalf A Concise History of India (Cambridge 2002) p.101 Foreign Consultations, 31 July 1857, Nos. 86-9. Printed proclaimation sent to G.F. Edmonostone, Secreatry to Government of India by M.H. Court, Magistrate of Allahabad „who got them from Mr. Wilcock at Cownpore‟. Natioal Archives Delhi. 7

9

REASONS FOR THE FAILURE OF THE REVOLT Inspite of being a popular revolt, the revolt failed to achieve its objective. The main reasons were:

i.

WEAK LEADERSHIP: The revolt of 1857 failed because it suffered from weak leadership and was hardly organized. Most of the leaders lacked a national perspective and were motivated by narrow, personal gains. They fought to liberate only their own territories. No national leaders emerged to coordinate the movement and give it a purpose and direction . This proved a major handicap when dealing with the well trained and trained and equipped British troops.

ii.

LACK OF UNITY: The revolt was ed and led by a few discontented rulers of India. The majority of the Indian rulers remained aloof. These included the Sindhia of Gwalior, the Holkar of Indore, the Nizam of Hyderabad, the Raja of Jodhpur, the Nawab of Bhopal, the Sikh chieftains of Punjab, the Maharaja of Kashmir, the Ranas of Nepal and so on. The Sikh princes of Nabhya, Patiala and Kapurthala and the rulers of Hyderabad and Gwalior very openly helped the British suppress the war with men and money. Holka and Scindia remained loyal to the British. Canning referred to these chieftains as having "acted as breakwaters to the storm, which would have otherwise swept us in one great wave".

iii.

LACK OF : The revolt did not spread to all parts of the country. Nor was it ed by all groups and sections of the Indian society. South and West India remained largely outside the fold of the revolt. Many Indian rulers refused to help the rebels and some were openly hostile to the rebels and helped the British in suppressing the revolt. The British military was ed by the loyal Indian soldiers of Bombay, Madras, and Punjab, suppressed the short-sighted rebellion, and reasserted their military dominance over mutinous

10

regions 8 .The middle and upper classes and the modern educated Indians also did not the revolt as they falsely believed that the English rule was essential for modernsing India. They were also alarmed by the rebel's appeals to superstitions and their staunch opposition to progressive social measures

iv.

POOR EQUIPMENT: The Indian soldiers were poorly equipped materially, fighting generally with swords and spears and very few guns and muskets. On the other hand, the European soldiers were equipped with the latest weapons of war like the Enfield rifle. The electric telegraph kept the commander-in-chief informed about the movements and strategy of the rebels.

v.

LACK OF ALTERNATIVE PLAN: The rebels had no alternative to British istration. This point has been highlighted by Bipin Chandra. According to him "It lacked a forward-looking programme, coherent ideology, a political perspective or a vision of the future society and economy". Moreover the also mutineers lacked a clear understanding of colonial rule.

8

Lawrence James The Rise & Fall of the British Empire (London 1998) p. 231

11

CONSEQUENCES OF THE REVOLT

i.

END OF COMPANY’S RULE:

The British Parliament ed an "Act for the Better Government of India" in 1858, whereby the istration responsibility was ed into the hands of the British Queen and her Parliament. With this, the rule of the Company came to an end. The Board of Control was abolished and the Board of Directors had no power left. A secretary of State for India was to take the place of the President of the Board of Control. He was advised by a board of fifteen . The designation of the Governor-General was changed. While he remained Governor-General for the provinces under his rule, he came to be known as Viceroy while dealing with Nawabs, Rajas and native princes.

ii.

CHANGE IN THE BRITISH POLICY TOWARDS INDIAN STATES:

Queen Victoria's first act after the suppression of rebellion was to issue a Proclamation to the Indian public telling them-through the various tongues and dialects in the amalgamation of public utility and improvement' and respect the religious beliefs of the people and the titles of some Indian princes who had been deposed in recent years9. Further, Doctrine of Lapse was abandoned and the right to adoption recognized. The Indian princes were assured that their territories would never be annexed. Henceforth, the continual existence of Native States was guaranteed. However, there were clearly defined restrictions and limitations to them. The military prowess was greatly reduced.

iii.

END OF PESHWANSHIP AND THE MUGHAL RULE:

Nana Sahib escaped after the Revolt as he had actively taken part in it. He could not be traced after that. With his escape the Peshwaship came to an end. The title of Mughal emperor was also abolished as the last Mughal emperor, Bahadur Shah Zafar who also took part in the Revolt died in 1862. Thus, came the end of the glorious Mughal dynasty founded by Babur in 1526 in the first battle of Panipath.

9

Barbara D. Metcalf and Thomas R. Metcalf A Concise History of India (Cambridge 2002) p.105

12

iv.

REORGANISATION OF THE ARMY:

The British soldiers realized that the numerical inferiority of the British Indian army was one of the causes of the Revolt. Resentful of the rebels of Benares and Oudh, the mutineers were shot, hung, or blown from cannons by the tens of thousands, and preference was shifted to loyal areas for recruiting grounds for the army 10 . The British soldiers were increased in number which means, the expenditure also increased. Artillery and other advanced means of warfare were in the care of British hands. In order to break down the unity of the Indian soldiers, they were divided and separated.

v.

ECONOMIC EXPLOITATION OF INDIA:

Economic exploitation of the country was an inevitable situation after the Revolt. India now became a dumping ground of British manufacturers and an almost inexhaustible field for investment of capital for it offered unlimited scope for commercial and industrial enterprises like railways, steamers, tea, and coffee plantations. The British henceforth started abusing political power for the enhancement of their commercial and economic interest.

vi.

RISE OF NATIONALISM:

The sacrifices of some great Indian rulers during the Revolt of 1857 aroused feelings of Nationalism among men. Nana Sahib, Rani of Jhansi and Bahadur Shah became National heroes. The revolt became a symbol of challenge to the mighty British power in India.

vii.

POLICY OF DIVIDE AND RULE:

During the Revolt of 1857 the Hindus and Muslims had unity and fought together for the welfare of the country. The British government realized that the unity of the Hindus and Muslims was posing a serious threat and therefore the best thing would be to create a wall between the two communities. Thus, they adopted the "Divide and Rule" that completely destroyed the relationship. The Survey of India and Census of India, founded in 1878 and 1872 respectively, are examples of the pseudo-scientific ways that the British tried to racially categorize and control their subjects11. This policy of the British developed so much unrest between the two

10 11

C.A. Bayley Indian Society and the Making of the British Empire (Cambridge 1988) p. 102 Barbara D. Metcalf and Thomas R. Metcalf A Concise History of India (Cambridge 2002) p.112.

13

communities, that it has still not been resolved. As the Muslims had taken a prominent role in the Revolt, they were deprived of patronage in education, business and services and Hindus were given preferential treatment. At a later stage the Policy was reversed. The British used this disharmony to their advantage and widened the gulf between the two major communities. It was on this ground that India had to be partitioned on the event of her independence in 1947.

14

CONCLUSION Though the revolt was started by the Indian soldiers in the service of the East India Company, it soon proliferated all over the country. Millions of peasants, artisans and soldiers fought heroically for over a year and sacrificed their life so that others might live. Hindus and Muslims kept their religious differences aside and fought together in order to free themselves from foreign subjugation. The British tried to dismiss this Revolt by merely calling it a "Sepoy Mutiny", but this Revolt clearly shows the suppressed hatred that the Indians had for the foreigners. The Revolt did not take place overnight. There were many economic causes: the British were exploiting the Indian economy and thus leaving many people jobless, helpless and homeless. Many social and religious causes: the British started imposing their religion on the Indians by building churches and by forcing people to convert to Christianity. Furthermore, the Doctrine of Lapse, whereby adopted children were refused recognition and deprived of pension, instigated the political causes of the Revolt. The British did not even spare the Indian soldiers. Rough treatment was meted out to the soldiers and they lived in squalor. The British left no stone unturned to create an eternal wall between Hindus and Muslims. The introduction of the greased cartridges took the situation to its highest point and thus in addition to economic, social and political causes there were military causes added to the Revolt of 1857. The Revolt of 1857 was clearly not a success but it is unfair to dismiss it as a mere mutiny. This was the first time when Indians got together to fight against an invincible power. The Revolt failed due to lack of planning, organization and leadership. The unfortunate part however was that there were some Indians who helped the British suppress the Revolt. Had they cooperated, the Revolt might have been a success. Even though the Revolt was a failure, the consequences of the Revolt were very important in the Indian history. The Revolt brought the end of Company's rule, along with changes in the British policy towards Indian States. With the escape of Nana Sahib and the death of Bahadur Shah Zafar came the end of Peshwaship and the Mughal Rule. The end of the Revolt also led to the reorganization of the army and India was completely ruined from economic point of view. One of the most important outcomes of the Revolt was that it gave rise to Nationalism. Indian people became more aware of the heroes, who sacrificed their lives so that others might live. The Revolt however, scarred the relationship between Hindus and Muslims with the Divide and Rule Policy. In the words of K.M. Pannikar, “On the Indian side 15

also the Mutiny loomed large. The rebels had been put down with a heavy hand. The atrocities of the white terror rankled long in Indian minds and poisoned the relation of the two races for decades”.

16

17