Jama Vs Jira Feature Comparison From A Test Perspective V0.2 5fai

JAMA versus JIRA Feature Comparison from a Test Perspective Document Status: Draft Version No. Author: Effective Date: File Name:

0.2 Kamran Sultan 2014-08-21 ???

Revision History

Revision History Ver #

Comments

Author

0.1

Initial Draft

Kamran Sultan

0.2

Minor changes correction to one of the feature

Kamran Sultan

Reviewed -

Approved

Date

-

2014-08-21

Document Approvals Name

File Name: Version No.: 0.1 Copyright 

2013 Schneider Electric (Australia) Pty. Ltd.

Role

Date

Page

Revision History

1

Introduction

1

Purpose

2

Document Scope

This feature comparison between JAMA versus JIRA document to evaluate JAMA as a complete solution that includes requirements management, test management, release management and defect tracking all fully integrated in a single tool from inception of a project. This document tries to list some of the many great features that would help make JAMA as the choice of tool for both Quality Assurance and Quality Control for Schneider Electric.

3

Intended Audience

The intended audience of this document includes (but is not limited to):  

Schneider Electric business stakeholders Development, Test and Science teams

File Name: Version No.: 0.1 Copyright 

2013 Schneider Electric (Australia) Pty. Ltd.

Page

Revision History

4

Features comparision in JAMA versus JIRA

Features

JAMA

JIRA

Test management tool?

Yes

Bug-tracking? Export and Import data? Requirements Management? Does it provide the ease for mapping Requirements to test artefacts? Bug Generation from Failed Steps? Can a Fail a test case at a specific test? Does it provide the capability of Traceability from bugs to Tests and Requirements? Does it have ability to map requirements to test cases to validate that the functionality works as expected? Can we view the /fail status of the tests that cover each requirement? Can we create templates feature for our test cases, test plan? Can we specify the expected result and suggested sample data for each test step in the system? Does it have the Test planning capability? Does it provide a single click to automatically track the time for test execution to assess for re-execution? Does it provide the ease of checking all the requirements have a test against it? Drill down from requirements to tests and incidents?

Yes Yes Yes Yes

No - An additional plugin is needed called Zephyr Yes Yes No No

Yes Yes

No No

Yes

Questionable as a lot effort involved in order to setup the traceability in JIRA No

The simplicity of managing all QA artefacts in one environment? Does it provide ability to Baseline our

File Name: Version No.: 0.1 Copyright 

2013 Schneider Electric (Australia) Pty. Ltd.

Yes

Yes

Yes – Difficult to trace as compared to JAMA

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes – very powerful level of drill capability which could be done bidirectional Yes

No

Yes

No

No

Page

Revision History

test case to the requirements? Does the Audit log of all changes made to requirements in the system? Discussion threads / comments attached to Requirements Ability to pause an incomplete test run and continue running it at a later date. Complete traceability from a recorded incident to the underlying requirement that was not satisfied Requirements and Test Cases can be mapped to Releases and Test cycles, with the option of filtering both by Release to give a release-specific picture of a project's requirements coverage and test execution Status? Ability to manage Test cycles? Single Click Impact Analysis which connects everything together with end-to-end traceability and impact analysis Digital Sign off on Test cases from the Dev team Review centre feature to bring the whole team on a single platform to provide comments and on the test cases or any other artefacts Specific functionality to individual Test Cycles

File Name: Version No.: 0.1 Copyright 

2013 Schneider Electric (Australia) Pty. Ltd.

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes Yes

No No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Page