Is 1893 (part 1)_ Criteria For Earthquake Resistant Design Of Structures, Part 1_ General Provisions And Buildings (fifth Revision) 526u8

इंटरनेट

मानक

Disclosure to Promote the Right To Information Whereas the Parliament of India has set out to provide a practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and ability in the working of every public authority, and whereas the attached publication of the Bureau of Indian Standards is of particular interest to the public, particularly disadvantaged communities and those engaged in the pursuit of education and knowledge, the attached public safety standard is made available to promote the timely dissemination of this information in an accurate manner to the public. “जान1 का अ+धकार, जी1 का अ+धकार”

“प0रा1 को छोड न' 5 तरफ”

“The Right to Information, The Right to Live”

“Step Out From the Old to the New”

Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan

Jawaharlal Nehru

IS 1893 (Part 1) (2002, Reaffirmed 2007): Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings (Fifth Revision). ICS 91.120.25

“!ान $ एक न' भारत का +नम-ण” Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda

“Invent a New India Using Knowledge”

“!ान एक ऐसा खजाना > जो कभी च0राया नहB जा सकता ह” है” ह Bhartṛhari—Nītiśatakam

“Knowledge is such a treasure which cannot be stolen”

(Reaffirmed 2007) IS 1893 ( Part 1 ) : 2002

~I '? rfJ 4 JOfI rJCfj

'ti XiF1I~ cB- 'l!Cf> J{Hl~ r:s \iiI ~ '1 cB- l"ll '1 ct~ (q/i/4/ y;Rte-rur ) Indian Standard CRITERIA FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN OF STRUCTURES PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS AND BUILDINGS

( Fifth Revision)

ICS 91.120.25

© BIS2002

BUREAU

OF

INDIAN

STANDARDS

MANAK BRAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG NEW DELHI 110002

June 2002

Price Group 12

IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2002

Indian Standard

CRITERIA FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN OF STRUCTURES PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS AND BUILDINGS

( Fifth Revision) FOREWORD This Indian Standard (Part 1 ) ( Fifth Revision) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards, after the draft finalized by the Earthquake Engineering Sectional Committee had been approved by the Civil Engineering Division Council. Himalayan-Nagalushai region, Indo-Gangetic Plain, Western India, Kutch and Kathiawar regions are geologically unstable parts of the country, and some devastating earthquakes of the world have occurred there. A major part of the peninsular India has also been visited by strong earthquakes, but these were relatively few in number occurring at luuch larger time intervals at any site, and had considerably lesser intensity. The earthquake resistant design of structures taking into sei smic data from studies of these Indian earthquakes has become very essential, particularly in view of the intense construction activity all over the country. It is to senre this purpose that IS 1893 : 1962 'Recommendations for earthquake resistant design of structures' was published and revised first time in 1966. As a result of additional seismic data collected in India and further knowledge and experience gained since the publication of the first revision of this standard, the sectional committee felt the need to revise the standard again incorporating many changes, such as revision of maps showing seismic zones and epicentres, and adding a more rational approach for design of buildings and sub·structures of bridges. These were covered in the second revision of IS 1893 brought out in 1970. As a result of the increased use of the standard, considerable amount of sug&estions were received for modifying some of the provisions of the standard and, therefore, third revision of the standard was brought out in 1975. The following changes were incorporated in the third revision: a)

The standard incorporated seismic zone factors ( previously given as multiplying factors in the second revision) on a more rational basis.

b)

Importance factors were introduced to for the varying degrees of importance for various structures.

c)

In the clauses for design of multi-storeyed buildings, the coefficient of flexibility was given in the form of a curve with respect to period of buildings.

d)

A more rational formula was used to combine modal shear forces.

e)

New clauses were introduced for determination of hydrodynamic pressures in elevated tanks.

f)

Clauses on concrete and masonry dams were modified, taking into their dynamic behaviour during earthquakes. Simplified formulae for design forces were introduced based on results of extensive studies carried out since second revision of the standard was published.

The fourth revision, brought out in 1984, was prepared to modify some of the provisions of the standard as a result of experience gained with the use ofthe standard. In this revision, a number of important basic modifications with respect to load factors, field values ofN, base shear and modal analysis were introduced. A new concept of performance factor depending on the structural framing system and on the ductility of construction was incorporated. Figure 2 for average acceleration spectra was also modified and a curve for zero percent damping incorporated.

IS 1893 (Part 1 ) : 2002 In the fifth revision, with a view to keep abreast with the rapid development and extensive research that has been carried out in the field of earthquake resistant design of various structures, the committee has decided to cover the provisions for different types of structures in separate parts. Hence, IS 1893 has been split into the following five parts: Part 1 General provisions and buildings Part 2 Liquid retaining tanks - Elevated and ground ed Part 3 Bridges and retaining waUs Part 4 Industrial structures including stack like structures Part 5 Dams and embankments Part 1 contains provisions that are general in nature and applicable to all structures. Also, it contains provisions that are specific to buildings only. Unless stated othenvise, the provisions in Parts 2 to 5 shall be read necessarily in conjunction with the general provisions in Part 1. NOTE - Pending finalization of Parts 2 to 5 of IS 1893, provisions of Part 1 will be read along with the relevant clauses of IS 1893 : 1984 for structures other than buildings.

The following are the major and important modifications made in the fifth revision: a)

The seismic zone map is revised with only four zones, instead of five. Erstwhile Zone I has been merged to Zone II. Hence, Zone I does not appear in the new zoning; only Zones II, III, IV and V do.

b)

The values of seismic zone factors have been changed; these now reflect more realistic values of effective peak ground acceleration considering Maximum Considered Earthquake ( MCE ) and service life of structure in each seismic zone.

c)

Response spectra are now specified for three types of founding strata, namely rock and hard soil, medium soil and soft soil.

d)

Empirical expression for estimating the fundamental natural period Ta. of multi-storeyed buildings with regular moment resisting frames has been revised.

e)

This revision adopts the procedure of first calculating the actual force that may be experienced by the structure during the probable maximum earthquake, if it were to remain elastic. Then, the concept of response reduction due to ductile deformation or frictional energy dissipation in the cracks is brought into the code explicitly, by introducing the 'response reduction factor' in place of the earlier performance factor.

t)

A lower bound is specified for the design base shear of buildings, based on empirical estimate of the fundamental natural period Ta•

g)

The soil-foundation system factor is dropped. Instead, a clause is introduced to restrict the use of foundations vulnerable to differential settlements in severe seismic zones.

h)

Torsional eccentricity values have been revised upwards in view of serious damages observed in buildings with irregular plans.

J)

Modal combination rule in dynamic analysis of buildings has been revised.

k)

Other clauses have been redrafted where necessary for more effective implementation.

It is not intended in this standard to lay down regulation so that no structure shall suffer any damage during earthquake of all magnitudes. It has been endeavoured to ensure that, as far as possible, structures are able to respond, without structural damage to shocks of moderate intensities and without total collapse to shocks of heavy intensities. While this standard is intended for the earthquake resistant design of normal structures, it has to be emphasized that in the case of special structures, such as large and tall dams, long-span bridges, major industrial projects, etc, site"specific detailed investigation should be undertaken, unless otherwise specified in the relevant clauses.

2

IS 1893 (Part 1 ) : 2002 Though the basis for the design of different types of structures is covered in this standard, it is not implied that detailed dynamic analysis should be made in every case. In highly seismic areas construction of a type which entails heavy debris and consequent loss of life and property, such as masonry, particularly mud masonry and rubble masonry, should preferably be avoided. For guidance on precautions to be obseIVed in the construction of buildings, reference maybe made to IS 4326, IS 13827 and IS 13828. j

Earthquake can cause damage not only on of the shaking which results from them but also due to other chain effects like landslides, floods, fires and disruption to communication. It is, therefore, important to take necessary precautions in the siting, planning and design of structures so that they are safe against such secondary effects also. The Sectional Committee has appreciated that there cannot be an entirely scientific basis for zoning in view of the scanty data available. Though the Inagnitudes of different earthquakes which have occurred in the past are known to a reasonable degree of accuracy, the intensities of the shocks caused by these earthquakes have so far been mostly estimated by damage surveys and there is little instrumental evidence to corroborate the conclusions arrived at. Maximwn intensity at different places can be fixed on a scale only on the basis of the observations made and recorded after the earthquake and thus a zoning map which is based on the maximum intensities arrived at, is likely to lead in some cases to an incorrect conclusion in view of (a) incorrectness in the assessment of intensities, (b) human error in judgment during the damage survey, and (c) variation in quality and design of structures causing variation in type and extent of damage to the structures for the same intensity of shock. The Sectional Committee has therefore, considered that a rational approach to the problem would be to arrive at a zoning map based on known magnitudes and the known epicentres ( see Annex A ) assuming all other conditions as being average and to modify such an idealized isoseismal map in light of tectonics (see Annex B), lithology (see Annex C) and the maximum intensities as recorded from damage surveys. The COlnmittee has also reviewed such a map in the light of the past history and future possibilities and also attempted to draw the lines demarcating the different zones so as to be clear of important towns" cities and industrial areas, after making special examination of such cases, as a little modification in the zonal demarcations may mean considerable difference to the economics of a project in that area. Maps shown in Fig. 1 and Annexes A, Band C are prepared based on information available upto 1993. In the seismic zoning map, Zone I and II of the contemporary map have been merged and assigned the level of Zone II. The Killari area has been included in Zone III and necessary modifications made, keeping in view the probabilistic hazard evaluation. The Bellary isolated zone has been removed. The parts of eastern coast areas have shown similar hazard to that of the Killari area, the level of Zone II has been enhanced to Zone III and connected with Zone III of Godawari Graben area. The seismic hazard level with respect to ZPA at 50 percent risk level and 100 years service life goes on progressively increasing from southern peninsular portion to the Himalayan main seismic source, the revised seismic zoning map has given status of Zone III to Narmada Tectonic Domain, Mahanandi Graben and Godawari Graben. This is a logical normalization keeping in view the apprehended higher strain rates in these domains on geological consideration of higher neotectonic activity recorded in these areas. Attention is particularly drawn to the fact that the intensity of shock due to an earthquake could vary locally at any place due to variation in soil conditions. Earthquake response of systems would be affected by different types of foundation system in addition to variation of ground motion due to various types of soils. Considering the effects in a gross manner, the standard gives guidelines for arriving at design seismic coefficients based on stiffness of base soil. It is important to note that the seismic coefficient, used in the design of any structure, is dependent on. nany variable factors and it is an extremely difficult task to determine the exact seismic coefficient in each given case. It is, therefore, necessary to indicate broadly the seismic coefficients that could generally be adopted in different parts or zones of the country though, of course, a rigorous analysis conSidering all the factors involved has to be made in the case of all important projects in order to arrive at a suitable seismic coefficients for design. The Sectional Committee responsible for the formulation of this standard has attempted to include a seismic zoning map ( see Fig. 1 ) for this purpose. The object of this map is to classify the area of the country into a number of zones in which one may reasonably expect earthquake shaking of more or less same maximum intensity in future. The Intensity as per Comprehensive Intensity Scale (MSK64 ) (see Annex D ) broadly associated with the various zones is VI ( or less ), VII, VIII and IX ( and above) for Zones II, III, IV and V respectively. The maximum seismic ground acceleration in each zone cannot be presently predicted with

3

IS 1893 (Part 1 ) : 2002 accuracy either on a deterministic or on a probabilistic basis. The basic zone factors included herein are reasonable estimates of effective peak ground accelerations for the design of various structures covered in this standard. Zone factors for some important towns are given in Annex E. Base isolation and energy absorbing devices may be used for earthquake resistant design. Only standard devices having detailed experimental data on the performance should be used. The designer must demonstrate by detailed analyses that these devices provide sufficient protection to the buildings and equipment as envisaged in this standard. Performance of locally assembled isolation and energy absorbing devices should be evaluated experimentally before they are used in practice. Design of buildings and equipment using such device should be reviewed by the competent authority. Base isolation systems are found useful for short period structures, say less than 0.7 s including soil-structure interaction. In the formulation of this standard, due weightage has been given to international coordination among the standards and practices prevailing in different countries in addition to relating it to the practices in the field in this country. Assistance has particularly been derived from the following publications:

a)

UBC 1994, Unifonn Building Code, International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, California, U,S.A.1994.

b)

NEHRP 1991, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, Part 1 : Provisions, Report No. FEMA 222, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., U.S,A., January 1992,

c)

NEHRP 1991, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, Part 2 : Commentary, Report No. FEMA 223, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., U,S.A., January 1992.

d)

NZS 4203 : 1992, Code of Practice for General Structural Design and Design Loadings for Buildings, Standards Association of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 1992.

In the preparation of this standard considerable assistance has been given by the Department of Earthquake Engineering, University of Roorkee; Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur; lIT Bombay, Mumbai~ Geological Survey of India; India Meteorological Department, and several other organizations. The units used with the items covered by the symbols shall be consistent throughout this standard, unless specifically noted otherwise. The composition of the Committee responsible for the formulation of this standard is given in Annex F. For the purpose of deciding whether a particular requirement of this standard is complied with, the final value observed or calculated, expressing the result of a test or analysis, shall be rounded off in accordance with IS 2 : 1960 'Rules for rounding off numerical values (revised)'. The number of significant places retained in the rounded off value should be the same as that of the specified value in this standard.

( Earthquake Engineering Sectional Committee, CEO 39 ) 4

MAP

F INDIA

Si'~Qlt~~NG

SEIS'.tlICZONESOF INDI.A

LEGEND

As in the Original Standard, this Page is Intentionally Left Blank

IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2002

Indian Standard CRITERIA FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN OF STRUCTURES PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS AND BUILDINGS

( Fifth Revision) IS No.

1 SCOPE 1.1 This standard ( Part I ) deals with assessment of seismic loads on various structures and earthquake resistant design of buildings. Its basic provisions are applicable to buildings~ elevated structures~ industrial and stack like structures~ bridges~ concrete masonry and earth dams; embankments and retaining . walls and other structures.

TUle

1343: 1980

Code of practice for pre-stressed concrete (first revision)

1498 : 1970

Classification and identification of soils for general engineering purposes (first revision)

1888: 1982

1.2 Temporary elements such as scaffolding, temporary excavations need not be designed for earthquake forces.

Method of load test on soils (second revision)

1893 (Part 4 )

1. J Thi s standard does not deal with the construction features relating to earthquake resistant design in buildings and other structures. For guidance on earthquake resistant construction of buildings, reference may be made to the following Indian Standards:

Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: Part 4 Industrial structures including stack like structures

2131: 1981

Method of standard penetration test for soils (first revision)

2809 : 1972

Glossary of and symbols relating to soil engineering ( first revision)

2810: 1979

Glossary of relating to soil dynamics (first revision)

4326 : 1993

Earthquake resistant design and construction of buildings - Code of practice ( second revision)

6403 : 1981

Code of practice for determination of bearing capacity of shallow foundations (first revision)

13827: 1993

Improving earthquake resistance of earthen buildings - Guidelines

IS 4326, IS 13827, IS 13828, IS 13920 and IS 13935.

2 REFERENCES

2.1 The following Indian Standards are necessary adjuncts to this standard: IS No. 456: 2000

800: 1984

875

Title Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete (fourth revision) Code of practice for general construction in steel ( second revision) Code of practice for design loads ( other than earthquake) for buildings and structures:

13828: 1993

Improving earthquake resistance of

low strength masonry buildings Guidelines

( Part 1 ) : 1987 Dead loads - Unit weights of building material and stored materials ( second revision) ( Part 2 ) : 1987 Imposed loads ( second revision)

(Part 3 ) : 1987 Wind loads ( second revision) ( Part 4 ) : 1987 Snow loads ( second revision)

13920: 1993

Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces - Code of practice

13935: 1993

Repair and seismic strengthening of buildings - Guidelines

SP 6 ( 6 ) : 1972 Handbook for structural engineers: Application of plastic theory in

( Part 5 ) : 1987 Special loads and load combinations ( second revision)

design of steel structures

7

IS 1893 (Part 1 ) : 2002 3 TERMINOLOGY FOR EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING

3.11 Effective Peak Ground Acceleration ( EPGA) It is 0.4 times the 5 percent damped average spectral acceleration between period 0.1 to 0.3s. This shall be taken as Zero Period Acceleration (ZPA).

3.1 For the purpose of this standard, the following definitions shall apply which are applicable generally to all structures.

3.12 Floor Response Spectra

NOTE - For the definitions of pertaining to soil mechanics and soil dynamics references may be made to IS 2809 and IS 2810.

Floor response spectra is the response spectra for a time history motion of a floor. This floor motion time history is obtained by an analysis of mUlti-storey building for appropriate material damping values subjected to a specified earthquake motion at the base of structure.

3.2 Closely-Spaced Modes Closely-spaced modes of a structure are those of its natural modes of vibration whose natural frequencies differ from each other by 10 percent or less of the lower frequency.

3.13 Focus The originating earthquake source of the elastic waves inside the earth which cause shaking of ground due to earthquake.

3.3 Critical Damping The damping beyond which the free vibration motion will not be oscillatory.

3.14 Importance Factor ( J) It is a factor used to obtain the design seismic force depending on the functional use of the structure, characterised by hazardous consequences of its failure, its post-earthquake functional need, historic value, or economic importance.

3.4 Damping The effect of internal friction, imperfect elasticity of material, slipping, sliding, etc in reducing the amplitude of vibration and is expressed as a percentage of critical damping.

3.15 Intensity of Eartbquake 3.5 Design Acceleration Spectrum

The intensity of an earthquake at a place is a measure of the strength of shaking during the earthquake, and is indicated by a number according to the modified Mercalli Scale or M.S.K. Scale of seismic intensities (see Annex D ).

Design acceleration spectrum refers to an average smoothened plot of maximum acceleration as a function of frequency or time period of vibration for a specified damping ratio for earthquake excitations at the base of a single degree of freedom system.

3.16 Liquefaction

3.6 Design Basis Earthquake ( DBE )

Liquefaction is a state in saturated cohesionless soil wherein the effective shear strength is reduced to negligible value for an engineering purpose due to pore pressure caused by vibrations during an earthquake when they approach the total confining pressure. In this condition the soil tends to behave like a fluid mass.

It is the earthquake which can reasonably be expected to occur at least once during the design life of the structure. 3.7 Design Horizontal Acceleration Coefficient (A h

)

It is a horizontal acceleration coefficient that shall be used for design of structures.

3.17 Lithological Features The nature of the geological formation of the earths crust above bed rock on the basis of such characteristics as colour, structure, mineralogical composition and grain size.

3.8 Design Lateral Force It is the horizontal seismic force prescribed by this standard, that shall be used to design a structure.

3.18 Magnitude of Earthquake ( Richter's Magnitude ) 3.9 Ductility The magnitude of earthquake is a number, which is a measure of energy released in an earthquake. It is defined as logarithm to the base 10 of the maximum trace amplitude, expressed in microns, which the standard short-period torsion seismometer ( with a period ofO. 8 S, magnification 2 800 and damping nearly critical ) would due to the earthquake at an epicentral distance of 100 km.

Ductilitv of a structure, or its , is the capacity to und~rgo large inelastic deformations without significant loss of strength or stiffness.

3.10 Epicentre The geographical point on the surface of earth vertically above the focus of the earthquake. 8

IS 1893 ( Part 1 ) : 2002 3.19 Maximum Considered Earthquake ( MCE )

idealized single degree freedom systems having certain period and damping, during earthquake ground motion. The maximum response is plotted against the undamped natural period and for various damping values, and can be expressed in of maximum absolute acceleration, maximum relative velocity, or maximum relative displacement.

The most severe earthquake effects considered by this standard.

3.20 Modal Mass (Mk ) Modal mass of a structure subjected to horizontal or vertical, as the case may be, ground motion is a part of the total seismic mass of the structure that is effective in mode k of vibration. The modal mass for a given mode has a unique value irrespective of scaling of the mode shape.

3.28 Seismic Mass It is the seismic weight divided by acceleration due to gravity. 3.29 Seismic Weight ( W)

3.21 Modal Participation Factor (Pk )

It is the total dead load plus appropriate specified imposed load.

amou~ts

of

Modal participation factor of mode k of vibration is the amount by which lllode k contributes to the overall vibration of the structure ooder horizontal and vertical earthquake ground motions. Since the amplitudes of 95 percent mode shapes can be scaled arbitrarily, the value of this factor depends on the scaling used for mode shapes.

It is a factor denoting the acceleration response spectrum of the structure subjected to earthquake ground vibrations, and depends on natural period of vibration and damping of the structure.

3.22 Modes of Vibration ( see Normal Mode)

3.31 Tectonic Features

3.23 Mode Shape Coefficient (lPik ) When a system is vibrating in normal mode k, at any particular instant of time, the amplitude of mass i expressed as a ratio of the amplitude of one of the masses of the system, is known as mode shape coefficient ( lPik)'

The nature of geological formation of the bed rock in the earth's crust revealing regions characterized by structural features, such as dislocation, distortion, faults, folding, thrusts, volcanoes with their age of formation, which are directly involved in the earth movement or quake reSUlting in the above consequences.

3.24 Natural Period ( T)

3.32 Time History Analysis

Natural period of a structure is its time period of undamped free vibration.

It is an analysis of the dynamic response of the structure at each increment of time, when its base is subjected to a specific ground motion time history.

3.30 Structural Response Factors (Sa /g)

3.24.1 Fundamental Natural Period ( T1 )

3.33 Zone Factor (Z)

It is the first ( longest) modal time period of vibration.

It is a factor to obtain the design spectrum depending on the perceived maximum seismic risk characterized by Maximum Considered Earthquake ( MCE ) in the zone in which the structure is located. The basic zone factors included in this standard are reasonable estimate of effective peak ground acceleration.

3.24.2 Modal Natural Period ( Tk ) The modal natural period of mode k is the time period of vibration in mode k.

3.25 Normal Mode

3.34 Zero Period Acceleration ( ZPA)

A system is said to be vibrating in a normal mode when all its masses attain ~aximum values of displacements and rotations simultaneously, and through equilibriunl positions sinlultaneously.

It is the value of acceleration response spectrum for period below 0.03 s (frequencies above 33 Hz). 4 TERMINOLOGY FOR EARTHQUAKE

3.26 Response Reduction Factor (R )

ENGINEERING OF

BU~DlNGS

It is the factor by which the actual base shear force, that would be generated if the structure were to remain elastic during its response to the Design Basis Earthquake ( DBE ) shaking, shall be reduced to obtain the design lateral force.

4.1 For the purpose of earthquake resistant design of buildings in this standard, the following definitions shall apply.

3.27 Response Spectrum

It is the level at which inertia forces generated in the structure are transferred to the foundation, which then transfers these forces to the ground.

4.2 Base

The representation of the maximum response of

9

IS 1893 (Part 1 ) : 2002 4.3 Base Dimensions ( d)

4.14 Lateral Force Resisting Element

Base dimension of the building along a direction is the dimension at its base, in metre, along that direction.

It is part of the structural system assigned to resist lateral forces.

4.4 Centre of Mass

4.15 Moment-Resisting Frame

The point through which the resultant of the masses of a system acts. This point corresponds to the centre of gravity of nlasses of system.

It is a frame in which and ts are capable of resisting forces primarily by flexure.

4.5 Centre of Stiffness

It is a moment-resisting frame not meeting special detailing requirements for ductile behaviour.

4.15.1 Ordinary Moment-Resisting Frame

The point through which the resultant of the restoring forces of a system acts.

4.15.2 Special A1oment-Resisting Frame

4.6 Design Eccentricity (edi )

It is a moment-resisting frame specially detailed to provide ductile behaviour and comply with the requirements given in IS 4326 or IS 13920 or SP 6 (6).

It is the value of eccentricity to be used at floor i in torsion calculations for design. 4.7 Design Seismic Base Shear ( VB)

4.16 Number of Storeys (n)

It is the total design lateral force at the base of a structure.

Number of storeys of a building is· the number of levels above the base. This excludes the basement storeys, where basement walls are connected with the ground floor deck or fitted between the building columns. But, it includes the basement storeys, when they are not so connected.

4.8 Diaphragm It is a horizontal, or nearly horizontal system, which transmits lateral forces to the vertical resisting elements, for example, reinforced ncrete floors and horizontal bracing systems.

4.17 Principal Axes Principal axes of a building are generally two mutually

4.9 Dual System

perpendicular horizontal directions in plan of a building along which the geometry of the building is oriented.

Buildings with dual system consist of shear walls ( or braced frames) and moment resisting frames such that: a)

The two systems are designed to resist the total design lateral force in proportion to their lateral stiffness considering the interaction of the dual system at all floor levels~ and

b)

The moment resisting frames are designed to independently resist at least 25 percent of the design base shear.

4.18 P-/1 Effect It is the secondary effect on shears and moments of frame due to action of the vertical loads, interacting with the lateral displacement of building resulting from seismic forves.

4.19 Shear WaH It is a wall designed to resist lateral forces acting in its own plane.

4.10 Height of Floor (hi)

4.20 Soft Storey

It is the difference in levels between the base of the building and that of floor i.

It is one in which the lateral stiffness is less than 70 percent of that in the storey above or less than 80 percent of the average lateral stiffness of the three storeys above.

4.11 Height of Structure ( h ) It is the difference in levels, in base and its highest level.

metres~

4.21 Static :£ccentricity ( esl )

between its

It is the distance between centre of mass and centre of rigidity of floor i.

4.12 Horizontal Bracing System

4.22 Storey

It is a horizontal truss system that serves the same function as a diaphragm.

It is the space between two adjacent floors.

4.13 t

4.23 Storey Drift

It is the portion of the column that is common to other , for example, beams, framing into it.

It is the displacement of one level relative to the other level above or below.

10

IS 1893 ( Part 1 ) : 2002 4.24 Storey Shear (

~)

It is the sum of design lateral forces at all levels above the storey under consideration. 4.25 Weak Storey

n

Number of storeys

N

SPT value for soil

Pk

Modal participation factor of mode k

0

Lateral force at floor i

Qik

Design lateral force at floor i in mode k

r

Number of modes to be considered as per 7.8.4.2

R

Response reduction factor

Sig

Average response acceleration coefficient for rock or soil sites as given by Fig. 2 and Table 3 based on appropriate natural periods and damping of the structure

T

Undamped natural period of vibration of the structure ( in second)

~I

It is one in which the storey lateral strength is less than 80 percent of that in the storey above. The storey lateral strength is the total strength of all seismic force resisting elements sharing the storey shear in the considered direction.

5 SYMBOLS The symbols and notations given below apply to the provisions of this standard: Ah

Design horizontal seismic coefficient

Ak

Design horizontal accele~ation spectrum value for mode 'k of vibrati.on

b.I

jth

Floor plan dimension of the building perpendicular to the direction offorce

T;.

Approximate fundamental period ( in seconds)

c

Index for the closelyl"spaced modes

Tk

Undamped natural period of mode k of vibration ( in second)

d

Base dimension of the building, in metres, in the direction in which the seismic force is considered.

T]

Fundamental natural period of vibration ( in second) .

DL

Response quantity due to dead load

VB

Design seismic base shear

e di

Design eccentricity to be used at floor i calculated as per 7.8.2

VB

Design base shear calculated using the approximate fundamental period Ta

e· 51

Static eccentricity at floor i defined as the distance between centre of mass and centre of rigidity

VI

Peak storey shear force in storey i due to all modes considered

V1k

Shear force in storey i in mode k

Response quantity due to earthquake load for horizontal shaking along x-direction

~oof Peak storey shear force at the roof due to

ELy

Response quantity due to earthquake load for horizontal shaking along y-direction

W

Seismic weight of the structure

Response quantity due to earthquake load for vertical shaking along z-direction

~ Z

Seismic weight of floor i

EL z

ELx

all modes considered

Zone factor Mode shape coefficient at floor i in mode k

F roel' Design lateral forces at the roof due to all modes considered

lPik

F.1

Design lateral forces at the floor i due to all modes considered

A-

g

Acceleration due to gravity

Peak response ( for example member forces, displacements, storey forces, storey shears or base reactions ) due to all modes considered

h

Height of structure, in metres

t\

h.1

Height measured from the base of the building to floor j

Absolute value ofmaximwn response in modek

Ac

Absolute value of maximum response in mode c, where mode c is a closely-spaced mode.

X"

Peak response due to the closely-spaced modes only

J

Importance factor

IL

Response quantity due to imposed load

Jvfk

Modal mass of mode k

11

IS 1893 (Part 1 ) : 2002 Pij

(OJ

Coefficient used in the Conlplete Quadratic Combination ( CQC ) method while combining responses of modes i and j

for this difference in actual and design lateral loads. Reinforced and prestressed concrete shall be suitably designed to ensure that premature failure due to shear or bond does not occur, subject to the provisions of IS 456 and IS 1343. Provisions for appropriate ductile detailing of reinforced concrete are given in IS 13920.

Circular frequency in rad/second in the i th mode

6 GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND DESIGN CRITERIA

In steel structures, and their connections should be so proportioned that high ductility is obtaine<:L vide SP 6 ( Part 6 ), avoiding premature failure due to elastic or inelastic buckling of any type.

6.1 General Principles 6.1.1 Ground Motion The characteristics (intensity, duration, etc ) of seismic ground vibrations expected at any location depends upon the magnitude of earthquake, its depth of focus, distance from the epicentre, characteristics of the path through which the seismic waves travel, and the soil strata on which the structure stands. The random earthquake ground motions, which cause the structure to vibrate, can be resolved in any three mutually perpendicular directions. The predominant direction of ground vibration is usually horizontal.

The specified earthquake loads are based upon postelastic energy dissipation in the structure and because of this fact, the provision of this standard for design, detailing and construction shall be satisfied even for structures and for which load combinations that do not contain the earthquake effect indicate larger demands than combinations including earthquake.

6.1.4 Soil-Structure Interaction The soil-structure interaction refers to the effects of the ing foundation medium on the motion of structure. The soil-structure interaction may not be considered in the seismic analysis for structures ed on rock or rock-like material.

Earthquake-generated vertical inertia forces are to be considered in design unless checked and proven by specimen calculations to be not significant. Vertical acceleration should be considered in structures with large spans, those in which stability is a criterion for design, or for overall stability analysis of structures. Reduction in gravity force due to vertical component of ground motions can be particularly detrimental in cases of prestressed horizontal melnbers and of cantilevered . Hence, special attention should be paid to the effect of vertical component of the ground motion on prestressed or cantilevered beams, girders and slabs.

6.1.5 The design lateral force specified in this standard shall be considered in each of the two orthogonal horizontal directions of the structure. For structures which have lateral force resisting elements in the two orthogonal directions only, the design lateral force shall be considered along one direction at a time, and not in both directions simultaneously. Structures, having lateral force resisting elements (for example frames, shear walls) in directions other than the two orthogonal directions, shall be analysed considering the load combinations specified in 6.3.2.

6.1.2 The response of a structure to ground vibrations is a function of the nature offoundation soil; materials, form, size and mode of construction of structures' and the duration and characteristics of ground motion: This standard specifies design forces for structures standing on rocks or soils which do not settle, liquefy or slide due to loss of strength during ground vibrations.

Where both horizontal and vertical seismic forces are taken into , load combinations specified in 6.3.3 shall be considered. 6.1.6 Equipment and other systems, which are ed at various floor levels of the structure will be subjected to motions corresponding to vibr~tion at their points. In important cases, it may be necessary to obtain floor response spectra for design of equipment s. For detail reference be made to IS 1893 (Part 4 ).

6.1.3 The design approach adopted in this standard is to ensure that structures possess at least a minimum strength to withstand minor earthquakes «DBE), which occur frequently, without damage; resist moderate earthquakes ( DBE ) without significant structural damage though some non-structural damage may occur; and aims that structures withstand a major earthquake ( MCE ) without collapse. Actual forces that appear on structures during earthquakes are much greater than the design forces specified in this standard. However, ductility, arising from inelastic material behaviour and detailing, and overstrength, arising from the additional reserve strength in structures over and above the design strength, are relied upon to

6.1.7 Additions to Existing Structures Additions shall be made to existing structures only as follows: a)

12

An addition that is structurally independent from an existing structures shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the seismic requirements for new structures.

IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2002

b)

addition that is not structurally independent from an existing structure shall be designed and constructed such that the entire structure conforms to the seismic force resistance requirements for new structures unless the following three conditions are complied with:

these shall be combined as per 6.3.1.1 and 6.3.1.2 where the DL, IL and EL stand for the response quantities due to dead load, imposed load and designated earthquake load respectively.

1)

The addition shall comply with the requirements for new structures,

In the plastic design of steel structures, the following load combinations shall be ed for:

2)

The addition shall not increase the seismic forces in any structural elements of the existing structure by more than 5 percent unless the capacity of the element subject to the increased force is still in compliance with this standard, and

An

3)

6.3.1.1 Load factors for plastiC design of steel structures

1)

1.7 (DL.+ 1L)

2)

1.7 ( DL ± EL )

3)

1. 3 ( DL + IL ± EL )

6.3.1.2 Partial safety factors for limit state design of reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete structures

The addition shall not decrease the seismic resistance of any structural element of the existing structure unless reduced resistance is equal to or greater than that required for new structures.

In the limit state design of reinforced and prestressed concrete structures, the following load combinations shall be ed for:

6.1.8 Change in Occupancy

1)

1.5 ( DL + IL )

When a change of occupancy results in a structure being re-classified to a higher importance factor (I), the structure shall conform to the seismic requirements for a new structure with the higher importance factor.

2)

1. 2 ( DL + 1L ± EL )

3)

l.S(DL±EL)

4)

0.9 DL ± 1.5 EL

6.2 Assumptions

6.3.2 Design Horizontal Earthquake Load

The following assumptions shall be made in the earthquake resistant design of structures:

6.3.2.1 When the lateral load resisting elements are oriented along orthogonal horizontal direction, the structure shall be designed for the effects due to full design earthquake load in one horizontal direction at time.

a)

Earthquake causes impulsive ground motions, which are complex and irregular in character, changing in period and amplitude each lasting for a small duration. Therefore, resonance of the type as visualized under steady -state sinusoidal excitations, will not occur as it would need time to build up such amplitudes.

6.3.2.2 When the lateral load resisting elements are not oriented along the orthogonal horizontal directions, the structure shall be designed for the effects due to full design earthquake load in one horizontal direction plus 30 percent of the design earthquake load in the other direction. .

NOTE - However, there are exceptions where resonance-like conditions have been seen to occur between long distance waves and tall structures founded on deep soft soils.

NOTE - For instance, the building should be designed for ( ± ELx ± 0.3 ELy) as well as (± 0.3 ELx ± ELy). where x and y are two orthogonal horizontal directions, EL in 6.3.1.1 and 6.3.1.2 shall be r-eplaced by ( ELx ± 0.3 ELy) or (ELy:l: 0.3 ELx ).

b) Earthquake is not likely to occur simultaneously with wind or maximum flood or maximum sea waves. c)

6.3.3 Design Vertical Earthquake Load

The value of elastic modulus of materials, wherever requited, may be taken as for static analysis unless a more definite value is available for use in such condition ( see IS 456, IS 1343 and IS 800 )

When effects due to vertical earthquake loads are to be considered, the design vertical force shall be calculated in accordance with 6.4.5. 6.3.4 Combination for Two or Three Component Motion

6.3 Load Combination and Increase in Permissible Stresses

6.3.4.1 When responses from the three earthquake components are to be considered, the responses due to each component may be combined using the

6.3.1 Load Combinations

When earthquake forces are considered on a structure, 13

IS 1893 (Part t ) : 2002

assumption that when the nlaximum response frOln one component occurs, the responses from the other two component are 30 percent of their maximum. All possible combinations of the three components ( ELx, ELy and ELz) including variations in sign (plus or minus) shall be considered. Thus, the response due earthquake force (EL ) is the maximum of the following three cases: 1)

±ELx±0.3ELy±O.3ELz

2)

±ELy±0.3ELx±OJELz

3)

± ELz± OJ ELx± 0.3 ELy

Zones III, IV. V and less than lOin seismic Zone II. the vibration caused by earthquake may cause liquefaction or excessive total and differential settlements. Such sites should preferably be avoided while locating new settlements or important projects. Otherwise, this aspect of the problem needs to be investigated and appropriate methods of compaction or stabilization adopted to achieve suitable N-values as indicated in Note 3 under Table 1. Alternatively, deep pile foundation may be provided and taken to depths well into the layer which is not likely to liquefy. Marine clays and other sensitive clays are also known to liquefy due to collapse of soil structure and will need special treatment according to site condition.

where x andy are two orthogonal directions and z is vertical direction.

NOTE - Specialist literature may be referred for determining liquefaction potential of a site.

6.3.4.2 As an alternative to the procedure in 6.3.4.1, the response (EL) due to the combined effect of the three components can be obtained on the basis of 'square root of the SUDl of the square (SRSS), that

6.4 Design Spectrum

6.4.1 For the purpose of determining seismic forces, the country is classified into four seismic zones as shown in Fig. l.

is

EL = ~ (ELx? + (ELy

f

+ (ELz)2

6.4.2 The design horizontal seismic coefficient Ah for a structure shall be determined by the following expression:

NOTE - The combination procedure of 6.3.4.1 and 6.3.4.2 apply to the same response quantity (say, moment in a column about its major axis, or storey shear in a frame) due to different components ofthe ground motion.

6.3.4.3 When two component motions ( say one horizontal and one vertical, or only two horizontal) are combined, the equations in 6.3.4.1 and 6.3.4.2 should be modified by del !ting the term representing the response due to the component of motion not being considered.

=

A h

ZIS (l

2Rg

Provided that for any structure with T ~ 0.1 s, the value of Ah will not be taken less than 2/2 whatever be the value of fiR where

6.3.5 Increase in Permissible Stresses 6.3.5.1 Increase in permissible stresses in materials When earthquake forces are considered along with other normal design forces, the permissible stresses in material, in the elastic method of design, may be increased by one-third. However, for steels having a definite yield stress, the stress be limited to the yield stress; for steels without a definite yield point, the stress will be limited to 80 percent of the ultimate strength or 0.2 percent proof stress, whichever is smaller; and ~at in prestressed concrete , the tensile stress in the extreme fibers of the concrete may be permitted so as not to exceed two~thirds of the modulus of rupture of concrete.

6.3.5.2 Increase in allowable pressure in soils When earthquake forces are included, the allowable bearing pressure in soils shall be increased as per Table I, depending upon type of foundation of the structure and the type of soil. In soil deposits consisting of submerged loose sands and soils falling under classification SP with standard penetration N-values less than 15 in seismic

z

Zone factor given in Table 2, is for the Maximum Considered Earthquake ( MCE ) and service life of structure in a zone. The factor 2 in the denominator of Z is used so as to reduce the Maximum Considered Earthquake ( MCE ) zone factor to the factor for Design Basis Earthquake ( DBE ).

I

Importance factor, depending upon the functional use of the structures, characterised by hazardous conse~uences of its failure) post-earthquake functional needs, historical value, or economic importance (Table 6).

R

Re~ponse reduction factor, depending on the perceived seismic damage perfonnance of the structure, characterised by ductile or brittle deformations. However, the ratio (fiR) shall not be greater than 1.0 ( Table 7 ). The values of R for buildings are given in Table 7.

Sa Ig = Average response ac;celeration coefficient 14

IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2002 Table 1 Percentage of Permissible Increase in Allowable Bearing Pressure or Resistance of Soils (Clause 6.3.5.2 ) Type of Soil Mainly Constituting the Foundation

Foundation

Sl No.

I Rock or Hard Soil : Well graded gravel and sand grave] mixtures with or without clay binder, and clayey sands poorly graded or sand day mixtures ( GB, CW, SB, SW, and SC )1) having Nl) above 30, where N is the standard penetration value

rType

Type III Soft Soils: All soils other than SpI) with N < 10

(2)

(3 )

(4 )

(5 )

Piles ing through any

50

50

50

25

2S

{I ) i)

Type 11 Medium SdiJs : All soils with N between 10 and 30, and poorly graded sands or gravelly sands with little or no fines (SP!) with N> 15

soil but resting on soil type I ii)

Piles not covered under item i

iii)

Raft foundations

50

50

50

iv)

Combined isolated RCC footing with tie beams

50

25

25

v)

Isolated ReC footing without tie beams. or unreinforced strip foundations

50

25

vi)

Well foundations

50

25

25

NOTES 1 The allowable bearing pressure shall be determined in accordance with IS 6403 or IS 1888.

2 If any increase in bearing pressure has already been permitted for forces other than seismic forces, the total increase in al10wable bearing pressure when seismic force is also included shall not exceed the limits specified above. 3 Desirable minimum field values of N - If soils of smaller N-values are met, compacting may be adopted to achieve these values or deep pile foundations going to stronger strata should be used. 4 The values of N ( corrected values) are at the founding level and the allowable bearing pressure shall be determined in accordance with IS 6403 or IS 1888.

SeismiC Zone level (in metres)

Depth Below Ground

N-Values

III, IV and V

s5

15

~

II ( for important structures only)

25

10

s5 ~

15

Remark

For values of depths between 5 m and 10 m. linear interpolation is recommended

20

10

5 The piles should be designed for lateral loads neglecting lateral resistance of soil layers liable to liquefy. 6 IS 1498 and IS 2131 may also be referred. 7 Isolated R.C.C. footing without tie beams, or unreinforced strip foundation shall not be permitted in soft soils with

N< 10. I)

See IS 1498.

2)

See IS 2l3I.

15

IS 1893 (Part 1 ) : 2002 for rock or soil sites as given by Fig. 2 and Table 3 based on appropriate natural periods and damping ofthe structure. These curves represent free field ground motion.

foundations placed between the ground level and 30 m depth, the design horizontal acceleration spectrum value shall be linearly interpolated between Ah and 0.5 A h, whereA h is as specified in 6.4.2.

NOTE - For various types of structures, the values ofImportance Factor I, Response Reduction Factor R, and damping values are given in the respective parts of this standard. The method ( empirical or otherwise) to calculate the natural periods of the structure to be adopted for evaluating S/g is also given in the respective parts of this standard.

6.4.5 The design acceleration spectrum for vertical motions, when required, may be taken as two-thirds of the design horizontal acceleration spectrum specified in 6.4.2. Figure 2 shows the proposed 5 percent spectra for rocky and soils sites and Table 3 gives the multiplying factors for obtaining spectral values for various other dampings.

Table 2 Zone Factor, Z ( Clause 6.4.2 )

For rocky, or hard soil sites

Seismic Zone

n

III

IV

V

Seismic Intensity

Low

Moderate

Severe

Very Severe

Z

0.10

0.16

0.24

0.36

1 + 15 T;

0.00 ~ T~'0.10

2.50

0.10 ~ T~0.40

1.00lT

0.40 ~ T~4.00

For medium soil sites

[1 + 15 T;

s

6.4.3 Where a number of modes are to be considered for dynamic analysis, the value of Ah as defined in 6.4.2 for each mode shall be determined using the natural period of vibration of that mode.

ga ==

2.50

O.OOS;TS;O.lO 0.10 ~ T~ 0.55

1. 361T

0.55 ~ T~ 4.00

!

For soft soil sites

6.4.4 For underground structures and foundations at depths of 30 nl or below, the design horizontal acceleration spectrum value shall be taken as half the value obtained from 6.4.2. For structures and

S ga =

O.OO~T~O.IO

1+ l5T; 2.50

0.10 ~ T~ 0.67

1. 671T

0.67:ST~4.00

3.0 Type I (Rock, or Hard Soil

J2> (':I

Type II (Medium Soil)

2.5

(f)

-

-..c: Q)

'(3

it:

Type III (Soft Soil)

2.0

Q,)

0

U

r=

0

~

1.5

.... Q (0

a:;

(.)

u

~

1.0 '"

"iV ,...

..... 0 Q)

a.

.......

0.5

'.'--. .......... ..

""'

......

...........

U)

0.0 L -____~____~--~--~----~----~------~--__~____~ 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Pariod(s)

FIo. 2 REsPONSE SPECfRA FOR ROCK AND SoIL SITES FOR 5 PERCENT DAMPING 16

IS 1893 (Part 1 ) : 2002 6.4.6 In case design spectrunl is specifically prepared for a structure at a particular project site, the sam~ may be used for design at the discretion of the project authorities

and 6.3.1.2 where the gravity loads are combined with the earthquake loads [ that is, in load combinations (3) in 6.3.1.1, and (2) in6.3.1.2]. Nofurtherreduction in the imposed load will be used as envisaged in IS 875 ( Part 2 ) for number of storeys above the one under consideration or for large spans of beams or floors.

7 BUILDINGS 7.1 Regular and Irregular Configuration

7.3.4 The proportions of imposed load indicated above for calculating the lateral design forces for earthquakes are applicable to average conditions. Where the probable loads at the time of earthquake are more accurately assessed, the designer may alter the proportions indicated or even replace the entire imposed load proportions by the actual assessed load. In such cases, where the imposed load is not assessed as per 7.3.1 and 7.3.2 only that part of imposed load, which possesses mass, shall be considered. Lateral design force for earthquakes shall not be calculated on contribution of impact effects from imposed loads.

To perfornl well in an earthquake, a building should possess four main attributes, namely simple and regular configuration, and adequate lateral strength, stiffness and ductility. Buildings having simple regular geometry and uniformly distributed mass and stiffness in plan as well as in elevation, suffer much less damage than buildings with irregular configurations. A building shall be considered as irregular for the purposes of this standard, if at least one of the conditions given in Tables 4 and 5 is applicable. 7.2 Importance Factor I and Response Reduction Factor R

7.3.5 Other loads apart from those given above (for example snow and permanent equipment) shall be considered as appropriate.

The nlininmm value of importance factor, 1, for different building systems shall be as given in Table 6. The response reduction factor, R, for different building systems shall be as given in Table 7.

7.4 Seismic Weight 7.4.1 Seismic Weight of Floors

7.3 Design Imposed Loads for Earthquakes Force Calculation

The seismic weight of each floor is its full dead load plus appropriate amount of imposed load, as specified in 7.3.1 and 7.3.2. While computing the seismic weight of ~ach floor, the weight of columns and walls in any storey shall be equally distributed to the floors above and below the storey.

7.3.1 For various loading classes as specified in IS 875 (Part 2), the earthquake force shall be calculated for the full dead load plus the percentage of imposed load as given in Table 8.

7.4.2 Seismic Weight of Building

7.3.2 For calculating the design seismic forces of the structure, the imposed load on roof need not be considered.

The seismic weight of the whole building is the sum of the seismic weights of all the floors.

7.3.3 The percentage ofimposed loads given in 7.3.1 and 7.3.2 shall also be used for 'Whole frame loaded' condition in the load combinations specified in 6.3.1.1

7.4.3 Any weight ed in between storeys shall be distributed to the floors above and below in inverse proportion to its distance from the floors.

Table 3 Multiplying Factors for Obtaining Values for Other Damping (Clause 6.4.2) Damping, pel'cent Factors

0

2

5

7

10

15

20

25

30

3.20

1.40

1.00

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.55

0.50

17

IS 1893 (Part 1 ) : 2002

Table 5 - Concluded

Tab Ie 4 Definitions of Irregular Buildings Plan Irregularities (Fig. 3 ) (Clause 7.1 ) S1 No.

Irregularity Type and Description

(l )

(2)

i)

SI No.

Irregularity Type and Description

(I)

(2)

Mass Irregularity

ii)

Mass irregularity shall be considered to exist where the seismic weight of any storey is more than 200 percent of that of its adjacent storeys. The irregularity need not be considered in case of roofs

Torsion Irregularity

ii)

To be considered when floor diaphragms are rigid in their own plan in relation to the vertical structural elements that resist the lateral forces. Torsional irregularity to be considered to exist when the maximum storey drift, computed with design eccentricity, at one end of the structures transverse to an axis is more than 1.2 times the average of the storey drifts at the two ends of the structure Re-enl'rant Corners

iii)

Plan contigurations of a structure and its lateral force resisting system contain re-entrant corners, where both projections of the structure beyond the re-entrant corner are greater than 15 percent of its plan dimension in the given direction Diaphragm Discontinuity

iii)

iv)

v)

Discontinuity in Capacity - Weak Strorey

v)

A weak storey is one in which the storey lateral strength is less than 80 percent of that in the storey above. The storey lateral strength is the total strength of all seismic force resisting elements sharing the storey shear in the considered direction.

Table 6 Importance Factors, I

Out-aI-Plane Offsets Discontinuities in a lateral force resistance path, such as out-of-plane offsets of vertical elements Non-parallel Systems

( Clause 6.4.2 )

(1)

(2)

i)

Important service and community buildings, such as hospitals; schools; monumental structures; emergency buildings like telephone exchange, television stations, radio stations, railway stations, tire station buildings~ large community halls like cinemas, assembly halls and subway stations, power stations

( Clause 7.1 )

i)

Irregularity Type and Description (2) a)

Importance

Factor

Table 5 Definition of Irregular BuildingsVertical Irregularities ( Fig. 4 )

(1)

Structure

Sl No.

The vertical elements resisting the lateral force are not parallel to or symmetric about the major orthogonal axes or the lateral force resisting elements

Sl No.

In-Plane Discontinuity in Vertical Elements Resisting Lateral Force A in·plane offset of the lateral force resisting elements greater than the length of those elements

Diaphragms with abrupt discontinuities or variations in stiffness, including those having cut-out or open areas greater than 50 percent of the gross enclosed diaphragm area, or changes in effective diaphragm stiffness of more than 50 percent from one storey to the next iv)

Vertical Geometric irregularity Vertical geometric irregularity shall be considered to exist where the horizontal dimension ofthe lateral force resisting system in any storey is more than 150 percent of that in its adjacent storey

ii)

Stiffness Irregularity - Soft Storey

All other buildings

(3)

1.5

1.0

NOTES

A soft storey is one in which the lateral stitlness is less than 70 percent of that in the storey above or less than 80 percent of the average lateral stiffness of the three storeys above b) Stiffness Irregularity - Extreme Soft Storey A extreme soft storey is one in which the lateral stiffness is less than 60 percent of that in the storey above or less than 70 percent of the average stiffness of the three storeys above. For example, buildings on STILTS will fall under this category.

1 The design engineer may choose values of importance factor I greater than those mentioned above. 2 Buildings not covered in Sl No. (i) and (ii) above may be designed for higher value of I, depending on economy, strategy considerations like multi-storey buildings having several residential units. 3 This does not apply to temporary structures like excavations. scaffolding etc of short duration.

18

IS 1893 (Part 1 ) : 2002 I

I ~

,

I \

,I

" I

'~

VERTICAL COMPONENTS OF SEISMIC RESISTING SYSTEM

\

1---------------FLOOR

3 A Torsional Irregularity

A!L> 0,15-0,20 I

1

A/L>O·1S-0·20

'

I L

I

L_Jll L1

a..-.,,--,

-----fIDI

3 B Re-entrant Corner FIG.

3

PLAN IRREGULARITIES -

19

Continued

IS 1893 (Part 1 ) : 2002 MASS RESISTANCE

ECCENTRICITY

I

I

RIGID

..

l

OIAPHRA6MI

k--~

FLEXIBLE DIAPHRAGM

I

'~ ·l , ~~

VERTICAL COMPONENTS OF SEISMIC RESISTING SYSTEM

L8}0PENING FLOOR 3 C Diaphragm Discontinuity

~

r

//,

//" / / /

,/// / / ,

BUILDING SECTION

3 0 Out-ot-Plane Offsets

BUILDING

PLAN

3 E Non-Parallel System FlO.

3

PLAN IRREGULARITIES

20

////

SHEAR WALL

IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2002

STOREY STIFFNESS FOR THE BUILDING

. SOFT STOREY

ki < 0-7 Ki.-t-1

A

,.

WHEN

Y

OR ki <0.8 ( ki'+1 of ki;2 + ki+3 )

4 A Stiffness Irregularity

SEtSMIC

WEIGHT Wn

L'L 'LL vLL ~ '\

.A

1"- MASS HEAVY

".

,

A ",

" W1

/

/",,,,.///.r.r

,

MASS RATIO

MASS IRREGULARITY WHEN, Wi;r 2·0 Wt- 1

OR 4 B Mass Irregularity

FIG. 4 VERTICAL IRREGULARITIES -

21

Continued

Wi> 2-0 W~+1

IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2002

'io+----t--

5 H EA R

WALL

//l////// / 4

L2

""~l"

~

4 C Vertical Geometric I rregularity when ~ > 1.5 L1

STOREY STRENGTH (LATERAL) Fn

UPPER FLOOR

Fn - 1

a ,

~

'lb

,

.I

Fn-2

LOWER FLOOR

4 E Weak Storey when ~ < 0.8 ~ + 1

4 D In-Plane Discontinuity in Vertical Elements Resisting Lateral Force when b > a

FIG.

4 VERflCAL IRREGULARITIES

22

IS 1893 ( Part 1 ) : 2002

Table 7 Response Reduction Factor 1), R, for Building Systems" ( Clause 6.4.2 ) SI No.

Lateral Load Resisting System

R

(1)

(2 )

(3 )

?)

3.0

Building Frame Systems i)

Ordinary RC moment-resisting frame ( OMRF

ij)

Special RC moment-resisting frame ( SMRF )'~)

iii)

Steel frame with

iv)

5.0

a) Concentric braces

4.0

b) Eccentric braces

5.0

Steel moment resisting frame designed as per SP 6 ( 6 )

5.0

Building with Shear WaJls 4 ) v)

Load bearing masonry wall buildings 5) a) Unreinforced

1.5

b) Reinforced with horizontal RC bands

2.5

c) Reinforced with horizontal RC bands and vertical bars at corners of rooms and

3.0

jambs of openings vi)

Ordinary reinforced concrete shear walls 6)

3.0

vii)

Ductile shear walls 7)

4.0'

Buildings'with Dual SystemsS) viii)

Ordinary shear wall with OMRF

3.0

ix)

Ordinary shear wall with'SMRF "

4.0

Ductile shear waH with OMRF' '

4.5

Ductile shear wall with SMRF

5.0

x}

xi)

1) The values of response reduction factors are to be used fgr buildings with lateral load resisting elements, and not just for the lateral load resisting ele~ents built in isolation. ' '

2) OMRF are those designed and detailed as per IS 456 or IS 800 but not meeting ductile detailing requirement as per IS 13920 or SP 6 (6) respectively. 3)

SMRF defined in 4.15.2.

4)

Buifdings with shear walls also include buildings having shear walls and frames, but where: a) frames are not designed to carry lateral loads, or b) frames are designed to carry lateral loads but do not fulfil the requirements of 'dual systems'.

5)

Reinforcement should be as per IS 4326.

6)

Prohibited in zones IV and V.

7)

Ductile shear walls are those designed and detailed as per IS 13920.

8)

Buildings with dual systems consist of shear walls ( or braced frames) and moment resisting frames such that: a) the two systems are designed to resist the total design force in proportion to their lateral stiffness considering the interaction of the dual system at aU floor levels; and

b) the moment resisting frames are designed to independently resist at least 25 percent of the design seismic base shear.

.23

IS 1893 ( Part 1 ) : 2002

7.6.2 The approximate fundamental natural period of vibration ( Ta)' in seconds, of all other buildings, including moment-resisting frame buildings with brick

Table 8 Percentage of Imposed Load to be Considered in Seismic Weight Calculation (Clause 7.3.1 ) Imposed Uniformity Distributed Floor Loads ( kNI m1 )

Percentage of Imposed Load

(1)

(2)

Upto and including 3.0

25

Above 3.0

50

intil s, may be estimated by the empirical expression: 0.09

Yd where h

= Height ofbuilding, inm, as defined in 7.6.1~ and Base dimension of the building at the plinth level, in rn, along the considered direction of the lateral force.

d

7.5 Design Lateral Force

7.5.1 Buildings and portions thereof shall be designed and constructed, to resist the effects of design lateral force specified in 7.5.3 as a minimum.

7.7 Distribution of Design Force 7.7.1 Vertical Distribution o/Base Shear to Different Floor Levels

7.5.2 The design lateral force shall first be computed

for the building as a whole. This design lateral force shall then be distributed to the various floor levels. The overall design seismic force thus obtained at each floor level, shall then be distributed to individual lateral load resisting elements depending on the floor diaphragm action.

The design base shear (VB) computed in 7.5.3 shall be distributed along the height of the building as per the following expression: 2 Wh. I I n

L W. h. 2 j:::l J J

7.5.3 Design Seismic Base Shear

where

The total design lateral force or design seismic base shear ( VB) along any principal direction shall be determined by the following expression:

Qi = Design lateral force at floor i,

VB = AhW

where Ah

=

Design horizontal acceleration spectrum value as per 6.4.2, using the fundamental natural period Ta as per 7.6 in the considered direction of vibration; and

7.6.1 The approximate fundamental natural period

of vibration (Ta ), in seconds, of a moment-resisting frame building without brick infil s may be estimated by the empirical expression:

= Height of floor i measured from base, and

n

Number of storeys in the building is the number of levels at which the masses are located.

7.7.2.2 In case of building whose floor diaphragms can not be treated as infinitely rigid in their own plane, the lateral shear at each floor shall be distributed to the vertical elements resisting the lateral forces, considering the in-plane flexibility of the diaphragms.

for RC frame building for steel frame building

where h

hi

Seismic weight of floor i,

7.7.2.1 In case of buildings whose floors are capable of providing rigid horizontal diaphragm action, the total shear in any horizontal plane shall be distributed to the various vertical elements of lateral force resisting system, assuming the floors to be infinitely rigid in the horizontal plane.

7.6 Fundamental Natural Period

:::;: 0.085 hO. 75

=

7.7.2 Distribution o/Horizontal Design Lateral Force to Different Lateral Force Resisting Elements

W = Seismic weight of the building as per 7.4.2.

Ta .:::;: 0.075 hO. 75

Wi

Height of building, in m. This excludes the basement storeys, where basement walls are connected with the ground floor deck or fitted between the building columns. But, it includes the basement storeys, when they are not so connected.

NOTES 1 A floor diaphragm shall be considered to be flexible, ifit deforms such that the maximum lateral displacement measured from the chord of the deformed shape at any point of the diaphragm is more than 1.5 times the average displacement of the entire diaphragm.

24

IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2002

building shall be performed as per established methods of mechanics using the appropriate masses and elastic stiffness of the structural system, to obtain natural periods ( T) and mode shapes {~} of those of its modes of vibration that need to be considered as per 7.8.4.2.

2 Reinforced concrete monolithic slab-beam floors or those consisting of prefabricated/precast elements with topping reinforced screed can be taken a rigid diaphragms.

7.S Dynamic Analysis 7.S.1 Dynamic analysis shan be performed to obtain the design seismic force, and its distribution to different levels along the height of the building and to the various lateral load resisting elements, for the following buildings:

7.8.4.2 Modes to be considered

The number of modes to be used in the analysis should be such that the sum total of modal masses of all modes considered is at least 90 percent of the total seismic mass and missing mass correction beyond 33 percent. If modes with natural frequency beyond 33Hz are to be considered, modal combination shall be carried out only for modes upto 33 Hz. The effect of higher modes shall be included by considering missing mass correction following well established procedures.

a) Regular buildings - Those greater than 40 m in height in Zones IV and V, and those greater than 90 m in height in Zones II and III. Modelling as per 7.8.4.5 can be used. b)

Irregular buildings ( as defined in 7.1 ) All framed buildings higher than 12 m in Zones IV and V, and those greater than 40 m in height

in Zones n and III.

7.8.4.3 Analysis a/building subjected to design forces

The analytical model for dynamic analysis of buildings with unusual configuration should be such that it adequately models the types of irregularities present in the building configuration. Buildings with plan irregularities, as defmed in Table 4 ( as per 7.1 ) , cannot be modelled for dynamic analysis by the method given in 7.8.4.5.

The building may be analyzed by accepted principles of mechanics for the design forces considered as static forces. 7.8.4.4 Modal combination

The peak response quantities ( for example, member forces, displacements, storey forces, storey shears and base reactions) shall be combined as per Complete Quadratic Combination ( CQC ) method.

NOTE - For irregular buildings, Jesser than 40 m in height in Zones II and III, dynamic analysis, even though not mandatory, is recommended.

7.8.2 Dynamic analysis may be performed either by the Time History Method or by the Response Spectrum Method. However, in either method, the design base shear ( VB) shall be compared with a base shear ( VB) calculated using a fundamental period Ta, where Ta is as per 7.6. Where VB is less than VB' all the response quantities ( for example member forces, displacements, storey forces, storey shears and base reactions) shall be multiplied by Va / Va'

where r

= Number of modes being considered,

Pjj

=

A.i

7.8.2.1 The value of damping for buildings maybe taken as 2 and 5 percent ofthe critical, for the purposes of dynamic analysis of steel and reinforced concrete buildings, respectively.

Cross-modal. coefficient, Response quantity in mode i ( including sign ), Response quantity in mode j ( including sign ),

7.8.l Time History Method

8 ~ ( 1 + {3 ) {31.5

Time history method of analysis, when used, shall be based on an appropriate ground motion and shall be performed using accepted principles of dynamics.

Modal damping ratio (in fraction) as specified in 7.8.2.1,

7.8.4 Response Spectrum Method

Frequency ratio =

Response spectrum method of analysis shall be perfonned using the design spectrum specified in 6.4.2, or by a site-specific design spectrum mentioned in 6.4.6. 7.8.4.1 Free Vibration Analysis

m/mi ,

CO·I

Circular frequency in ith mode, and

00·j

Circular frequency injth mode.

Alternatively, the peak response quantities may be combined as follows:

Undamped free vibration analysis of the entire

25

IS 1893 ( Pal11 ) : 2HU2

a)

If the building does not have closely-spaced modes, then the peak response quantity ( A ) due to all modes considered shall be obtained as

c)

De~\'ign Lateral Force at EQch. Floor in Each Mode - The peak lateral force ( Qik) at floor i in mode k is given by

Qik = Ak ¢ik Pk WI where Ak = Design' horizontal acceleration spectrum value as per 6.4.'2 using the natural period of vibration ( Tk ) of mode k.

\\'here AI.:.

Absolute value of quantity in mode k. and

r

Number of modes being considered.

b)

d)

If the building has a few closely-spaced modes (see 3.2 ), then the peak response quantity ( A'" ) due to these modes shall be obtained as

Storey Shear Force.',' in Each lvlode - The peak shear force ( Vik ) acting in storey i in mode k is given by n

V

lk

-.~ £...J 0~ik j "" i + I

r

'A"

=

~'A L..J c'

e)

Storey Shear Fo"rce,\' due to All Modes Considered - The peakstorey shear force ( VJin storey i due to all modes considered is obtained by combining those due to each . mode in accordance with 7~8.4.4.

f)

Lateral Forces at Each Storey Due to All Modes Considered - The design lateral forces. F roo t' and F, at roof and at floor i : I .

c

where the summation is for the closely-spaced modes only. This peak response quantity due to the closely spaced modes ( A'" ) is then combined with those of the remaining well-separated modes by the method described in 7.8.4.4 (a). 7.8.4.5 Buildings with regular, or nominallyin:egular;i plan configurationsmay be modelled as a sxsteln'~f masses lumped at the floor levels with each mass having one degree of freedom, that of lateral displacement in the direction under consideration. In such a case: the following expressions shall hold in the computation of the various quantities: .~

a)

Frool .;::: Vrool'. and ~

(~ik)2

1+)

7.9.1. Provision shall be made ~n all buildings for increase in shear forces on.the lateral force resisting elements resulting from the horizontal torsional moment arising due ~o ec:ce~tricity betweell the centre of mass. and centre of rigidity. The design forces calculatecl as iJ). 7.8.4.5 are. to be applied at the centre of DlasS appropriately displaced so as to cause design eccentricity ( 7.9.2) between t.hedispla<.:ect'centre of mass and centre of rigidity. However, negative torsional shear shall be neglected.

[t Wi~i~l Wi

I

7.9 Torsion

Afodal AIa'l:s - The modal mass ( iv/k ) of mode k is given by

g!

v- V

.

i'" 1

7.9.2 The design eccentricity, e di to be used at floor i shaH be taken as:

where g

=

Acceleration due to gravity,

¢ik

=

Mode shape coefficient at floor i in mode k,and

=

Seismic weight offioor i.

rv

1

b)

1.5e 51 + 0.05 b1 e.-O.05b.· SI 1

whichever of these gives the more severe effect in the shear of any 'frame where' .

A10dal Participation Factors - The modal partici pation factor ( Pk ) of mode k is given by:

edi == Static eccentricity at floor i defined as the dista,nce between centre of mass and centre of rigidity, and

n

Pk

I I

Wi ¢ik

bi = Floor plan dimension of floor i, perpendicular to the direction of force.

WI (¢ik )2

NOTE The factor 1.5 represents dynamic amplification factor, while the factor 0.05 represents the extent of accidental eccentricity.

1= ! n

I =:

I

26

IS 1893 ( Part 1 ) : 2UH2

direction under consideration, do not lose their vertical load-carrying capacity under the induced moments resulting from storey deformations equal to R ti nles the storey displacements calculated as per 7.11. L where R is specified in Table 7.

7.9.3 In case of highly irregular buildings analyzed according to 7.8.4.5, additive shears will be superimposed for a statically applied eccentricity of ± O.05b j with respect to the centre of rigidity. 7.1U Buildings with Soft Storey

NOTE - For instance, consider a flat-slab building in which lateral load resistance is provided by shear walls. Since the:: lateral load resistance of the slab-column system is small, these art.: often designed only for the gravity loads, while all the seismic force is resisted by the shear walls. Even though the slabs and columns are not required to share the lateral forces, these deform with rest of the structure under seismic i()rce. The concern is that under such deti.)rmations, the slab·column system should not lose its vertical load capacity.

7.1 n.1 In case buildings with a flexible storey, such as the ground storey consisting of open spaces for parking that is Stilt buildings, special arrangement needs to be made to increase the lateral strength and stiffness of the soft/open storey. 7.10.2 Dynamic analysis of building is carried out

including the strength and stiffness effects of infills and inelastic deformations in the , particularly, those in the soft storey. and the designed accordingly.

7.11.3 Separation Between Adjacent Unit:·..

Two adjacent buildings, or two adjacent units of the same building with separation t in between shall be separated by a distance equal to the amount R times the sum of the calculated storey displacements as per 7.11.1 of each of them~ to avoid danlaging when the two units deflect towards each other. When floor levels of two similar adjacent units or buildings are at the same elevation levels, factor R in this requirement may be replaced by RI2.

7.10.3 Altenlatively, the following design criteria are to be adopted after carrying out the earthquake analysis. neglecting the effect of infill walls in other storeys: a)

b)

7.11

the columns and beams of the soft storey are to be designed for 2.5 times the storey shears and moments calculated under seismic loads specified in the other relevant clauses: or,

7.12 Miscellaneous

besides the columns designed and detailed for the calculated storey shears and moments, shear walls placed symmetrically in both . directions of the building as far away from the centre of the building as feasible~ to be designed exclusively for 1.5 times the lateral storey shear force calculated as before.

7.12.1 Foundations

The use of foundations vulnerable to significant differential settlement due to ground shaking shall be avoided for structures in seismic Zones III, IV and V In seismic Zones IV and V. individual spread footings or pile caps shall be interconnected with ties. (see 5.3.4.1 of IS 4326 ) except when individual spread footings are directly ed on rock. All ties shall be capable of carrying, in tension and in compression~ an axial force equal to Ah 14 times the larger of the column or pile cap load, in addition to the otherwise computed forces. Here, Ah is as per 6.4.2.

Deform~ltions

7.11.1 Storey Dr;/t Limitation

The storey drift in any storey due to the minimum specified design lateral force, with partial load factor of 1.0, shall not exceed 0.004 times the storey height.

7.12.2 Cantilever Projections

For the purposes of displacement requirements only ( see 7.11.1, 7.11.2 and 7.11.3 only), it is permissible to use seismic force obtained from the computed fundarnental period (1) of the building without the lower bound limit on design seismic force specified in 7.S.2.

7.12.2.1 Vertical projections

Tower, tanks, parapets, smoke stacks ( chimneys) and other vertical cantilever projections attached to buildings and projecting above the roof~ shall be designed and checked for stability for five times the design horizontal seismic coefficient A h specified in 6.4.2. In the analysis of the building, the weight of these projecting elements will be lumped with the roof weight.

There shall be no drift linlit for single storey building which has been designed to accommodate storey drift. 7.11.2 Deformation j\femhers

Compatibili~v

of Non-Seismic

7.12.2.2 Horizontal projection

All horizontal projections like cornices and balconies shall be designed and checked for stability for five times the design vertical coefficient spe~ified

For building located in seismic Zones IVand V, it shall be ensured that the structural components, that are not a part of the seismic force resisting system in the

27

IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2002 in 6.4.5 (that is

= 10/3 Ah ).

7.12.2.3 The increased design forces specified in 7.12.2.1 and 7.12.2.2 are only for deg the projecting parts and their connections with the main structures. For the design of the main structure, such increase need not be considered. 7.12.3 Compound Walls

Compound walls shall be designed for the design horizontal coefficient Ah with importance factor 1'= 1.0 specified in 6.4.2.

7.12.4 Connections Between Parts All parts ofthe building, except between the separation sections, shall be tied together to act as integrated single unit. All connections between different parts, such as beams to columns and columns to their footings, should be made capable of transmitting ,a force, in all possible directions, of magnitude ( Q(Wi) times but not less than 0.05 times the weight of the smaller part or the total of dead and imposed load reaction. Frictional resistance shall not be relied upon for fulfilling these requirements.

28

IS 1893 ( Part I ) : 2002

ANNEXA ( Foreword)

AND SURROUNDING

SHOWING EPICENTRES I AAABj 32

c

o

o o o

c

C(])'

0

&4

120

'4

240

9

F4

480

360

KILOMETRES

o o

o

•

JA'PUR

120

lUCKN~W

o

o

o

•

AAIPUR

o o

o

0

@

CO

•

HYDERABAO

0

,0 0

0

\,

0

.

Q

o

BANG .. LORE

12

MYSQRE

"

."

0

o

0

5.0 TO < 6.0

0

6.0 TO < 6.5

0

6.5 TO < 7.0

0

7.0 TO < 7.5

0

7.5 TO < 8.0

0 o

B

0

.(~

MAGNITUDE

0

o •

8

LEGEND

©

o

0"

~;:~I-15

P'i

S

00.

'\.

0

@ , - 12°

(-t\lr~f' ~ t8~ \'Y

MORE THAN 8.0 DEEP FOCUS SHOCKS

0

"\~

"j.~~

NUMBER OF SHOCKS (n) FROM THE SAME ORIGIN

\..

O·.~

. 88

'b

92°

© Government of India, Copyright Year 2001. Based upon Survey of India map with the permission of the Surveyor General of India. The responsibility for the correctness of internal details rests with the 'publisher. The territorial waters of India extend into the sea to distance of twelve nautical miles measured from the appropriate base line. The istrative headquarters of Chandigarh, Haryana and Punjab are at Chandigarh. The interstate boundaries between Arunachal Pradesh, Assam and Meghalaya shown on this map are as interpreted from the North-Eastern Areas (Reorganization) Act. 1971, but have yet to be verified. The external boundaries and coastlines of India agree with the Record/Master Copy certified by Survey of India.

29

C

)

0

.

-

~tQ~.

INDIAA POINT

8°

~.

~.

0'

.

MAP OF INDIA SHOWING

PRINCIPAL LITHOLOGiCAL, GROUPS

LEGEND

.;

As in the Original Standard, this Page is Intentionally Left Blank

IS 1893 (Part 1 ).: .200-2

ANNEXD

( Foreword and Clause 3. 15 ) COMPREHENSIVE INTENSITY SCALE (MSK 64 ) The scale was discussed generally at the intergovenunental meeting convened by UNESCO in April 1964. Though not finally approved the scale is more comprehensive and describes the intensity of earthquake more precisely. The main definitions used are followings; a)

b)

Type of Structures ( Buildings) Type A -

Building in field-stone, rural structures, unburnt-brick houses, clay houses.

Type B-

Ordinary brick buildings, buildings of large block and prefabricated type, half timbered structures, buildings in natural hewn stone.

Type C -

Reinforced buildings, well built wooden structures.

d)

Intensity Scale

1.

Not noticeable - The intensity of the vibration is below the limits of sensibility: the tremor is detected and recorded by seismograph only.

2.

Scarc;e~y noticeable

(very slight) - Vibration is felt only by individual people at rest in houses, especially on upper floors of buildings.

3.

Weak, partially observed only - The earthquake is felt indoors by a few people, outdoors only in favourable circumstances. The vibration is like that due to the ing of a light truck. Attentive observers notice a slight swinging of hanging objects. somewhat more heavily on upper floors.

4.

Large~y

observed - The earthquake is felt indoors by many people, outdoors by few. Here and there people awake, but no one is frightened. The vibration is like that due to the ing of a heavily loaded truck. Windows, doors, and dishes rattle. Floors and walls crack. Furniture begins to shake. 'Hanging objects swing slightly. Liquid in open vessels are slightly disturbed. In standing motor cars the shock is noticeable.

5.

Awakening

Definition of Quanti~v: Single, few About 5 percent

c)

Many

About 50 percent

Most

About 75 percent

Classification of Damage to BUildings

Grade 1 Slight damage

Fine cracks in plaster: fall of small pieces of plaster.

Grade 2 Moderate damage

Small cracks in plaster: fall offairly large pieces of plaster: pantiles slip off: cracks in chimneys parts of chimney fall down.

Grade 3 Heavy damage

Large and deep cracks in plaster: fall of chimneys.

Grade 4 Destruction

Gaps in walls: parts of buildings may collapse: separate parts of the buildings lose their cohesion: and inner walls collapse.

ii)

Total collapse of the buildings.

iii) Sometimes changes in flow of springs.

Grade 5 Total damage

i)

The earthquake is felt indoors by alL outdoors by many. Many people awake. A few run outdoors. Animals become uneasy. Building tremble throughout. Hanging objects swing consider~bly. Pictures knock against walls or swing out of place. Occasionally' pendulum clocks stop. Unstable objects overturn or shift. Open doors and windows are thrust open and slam back agaiR Liquids spill in small amounts from well-filled open containers. The sensation of vibration is like that due to heavy objects falling inside the

buHdi,ngs.

13

Slight damages in buildings of Type A are possible.

IS 1893 ( Part 1 ) : 2002 6.

Frightening i)

ii)

roads on steep slopes; cracks in ground upto widths of several centimetres. Water in lakes become turbid. New reseIVoirs

Felt by nlost indoors and outdoors. Many people in buildings are frightened and run outdoors. A few persons loose their balance. Domestic animals run out of their stalls. In few instances, dishes and glassware may break~ and books fall down. Heavy furniture may possibly move and small steeple bells may ring.

come into existence. Dry wells refill and existing wells become dry. In many cases. change in flow and level of water is observed. 9.

Damage of Grade 1 is sustained in single buildings of Type B and in many of Type A. Damage in few buildings of Type A is of Grade 2.

General damage o/buildlngs i)

General panic~ considerable damage to furniture. Animals run to and fro in confusion, and cry.

ii)

Many buildings of Type C suffer damage of Grade 3, and a few of Grade 4. Many buildings of Type B show a damage of Grade 4 and a few of Grade 5. Many buildings of Type A suffer damage of Grade 5. Monuments and columns fall. Considerable damage to reservoirs: underground pipes partly broken. In individual cases, railway lines are bent and roadway damaged.

iii) In few cases, cracks up to widths of

1cm possible in wet ground~ in mountains occasionallandslips: chailge in flow of springs and in level of well water are observed. 7.

Damage of hUildings i)

ii)

Most people are frightened and run outdoors. Many find it difficult to stand. The vibration is noticed by persons driving motor cars. Large bells ring.

iii) On flat land overflow of water, sand and

mud is often observed. Ground cracks to widths of up to 10 cm, on slopes and river banks more than 10 cm. Further more, a large number of slight cracks in ground: falls of rock, many land slides and earth flows~ large waves in water. Dry wells renew their flow and existing wells dry up.

In many buildings of Type C damage of Grade I is caused: in many buildings of Type B damage is of Grade 2. Most buildings of Type A suffer damage of Grade 3~ few of Grade 4. In single instances, landslides of roadway on steep slopes~ crack in roads; seams of pipelines damaged~ cracks in stone walls.

10. General destruction ofbuildings

iii) Waves are formed on water. and is made

i)

Many buildings of Type C suffer damage of Grade 4, and a few of Grade 5. Many buildings of Type B show damage of Grade 5. Most of Type A have destruction of Grade 5. Critical damage to dykes and dams. Severe damage to bridges. Railway lines are bent slightly. Underground pipes are bent or broken. Road paving and asphalt show waves.

ii)

In ground, cracks up to widths of several centimetres, sometimes up to 1 m. Parallel to water courses occur broad fissures. Loose ground slides from steep slopes. From river banks and steep coasts. considerable landslides are possible. In coastal areas, displacement of sand and mud~ change of water level in wells; water from canals, lakes. rivers. etc, thro\vn on land. New lakes occur.

turbid by mud stirred up. Water levels in wells change~ and the flow of springs changes. Some times dry springs have their flow resorted and existing springs stop flowing. In isolated instances parts of sand and gravelly banks slip off. 8.

Destruction ofbuildings i)

ii)

Fright and panic~ also persons driving motor cars are disturbed. Here and there branches of trees break off. Even heavy furniture moves and partly overturns. Hanging lamps are damaged in part. Most buildings of Type C suffer damage of Grade 2. and few of Grade 3. Most buildings of Type B suffer damage of Grade 3. Most buildings of Type A suffer damage of Grade 4. Occasional breaking of pipe seams. Memorials and monuments move and twist. Tombstones overturn. Stone walls collapse.

11. Destruction i)

iii) Smalliandslips in hollows and on banked 34

Severe damage even to well built buildings, bridges. water dams and

IS 1893 (Part 1 ) : 2002

ground are greatly danlaged or destroyed.

railway lines. Highways become useless. Underground pipes destroyed. ii)

ii)

Ground considerably distorted by broad cracks and fissures, as well as movement in horizontal and vertical directions. Numerous lands lips and falls of rocks. The intensity of the earthquake requires to be investigated specifically.

12. Landscape changes

i)

Practically all structures above and below

The surface of the ground is radically changed. Considerable ground cracks with extensive vertical and horizontal movements are observed. Falling of rock and slumping of river banks over wide areas, lakes are dammed; waterfalls appear and rivers are deflected. The intensity of the earthquake requires to be investigated specially.

ANNEXE

(Foreword) ZONE FACTORS FOR SOME IMPORTANT TOWNS Town

Zone

Zone Factor, Z

Agra

III

0.16

Ahmedabad

III

Ajmer

Zone

Zone Factor, Z

Chitradurga

II

0.10

0.16

Coimbatore

III

0.16

II

0.10

Cuddalore

0.16

Allahabad

II

0.10

Cuttack

III III

0.16

Almora

IV

0,24

Darbhanga

V

0.36

Ambala

IV

0.24

Darjeeling

N

0.24

Amritsar

IV

0.24

Dharwad

III

0.16

Asansol

III

0.16

Dehra Dun

N

0.24

Aurangabad

II

0.10

Dharampuri

III

0.16

Bahraich

IV

0.24-

Delhi

N

0.24

Bangalore

II

0.10

Durgapur

III

0.16

Barauni

N

0.24

Gangtok

IV

0.24

Bareilly

III

0.16

Guwahati

V

0.36

Belgaum

III

0.16

Goa

III

0.16

Bhatinda

HI

0.16

Gulbarga

II

0.10

Bhilai

II

0.10

Gaya

III

0.16

Bhopal

II

0.10

Gorakhpur

IV

0.24

Bhubaneswar

III

0.16

Hyderabad

II

0.10

Bhuj

V

0.36

Imphal

V

0.36

Bijapur

III

0.16

Jabalpur

III

0.16

Bikaner

0.16

Jaipur

IT

0.10

Sokaro

III III

0.16

Jamshedpur

IT

0.10

Bulandshalu

N

0.24

Jhansi

II

a.IO

Burdwan

fII

0.16

Jodhpur

II

0.10

Cailent

HI

0.16

lorhat

V

0.36

Challdigarh

IV

0.24

Kakrapara

III

0.16

Chcnnai

III

0.16

Kalapakkam

111

0.16

Town

]5

IS 1893 (Part 1 ) : 2002

Zone

Zone Factor, Z

Pondicherry

n

0.10

0.16

Pune

III

0.l6

III

0.16

Raipur

n

0.10

Kohima

V

0.36

Rajkot

III

0.16

Kolkata

III

0.16

Ranchi

II

0.10

Kota

n

0.10

Roorkee

N

0.24

Kurnool

II

0.l0

Rourkela

II

0.10

Lucknow

ITI

0.16

Sadiya

0.36

Ludhiana

IV

0.24

Salem

Madurai

n

0.10

Simla

V HI N

0.24

~..1andi

V

0.36

Sironj

n

0.10

Mangalore

III

0.16

Solapur

III

0.16

Monghyr

N

0.24

Srinagar

V

0.36

Moradabad

N

0.24

Surat

0.16

Mumbai

III

0.16

III III

0.10

Nagpur

n n

Thane

V III

0.36

Thanjavur

II

0.10

n

0.10

N agarjunasagar

Thirnvanantbapuram

III

0.16

Nainital

N III III

0.24

Town

Zone

Zone Factor, Z

Kanchipuram

III

0.16

Kanpur

III

Karwar

Mysore

Town

Tarapur

Tezpur

0.10

0.16

0.16 0.16

Tiruchirappali

n

0.10

0.16

Tiruvennamalai

III

0.16

0.16

Udaipur

n

0.10

0.16

Vadodara

III

0.16

Panjim

III III

0.16

Varanasi

III

0.l6

Patiala

III

0.16

Vellore

0.16

Patna

N

0.24

Vijayawada

III III

Pilibhit

N

0.24

Vishakhapatnam

n

0.10

Nasik

Nell ore Osmanabad

36

0.16

IS 1893 ( Part 1 ) : 2002

ANNEX F

( Foreword) COMMITTEE COMPOSmON

Earthquake Engineering Sectional Committee, CEO 39 Representative( s)

Organization In personal cap city ( 7216 Civil Lines. Roorkee 247667 )

DR A. S.

Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd, New Delhi

SHRI

Chairman)

ARYA (

N. C.

ADDY

C. KAMESHWARA RAO ( Alternate I ) SHRI A. K. SINGH ( Alternate II ) DR

Building Materials New Delhi

Technology

Promotion

Council,

T. N.

SHRI

Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee

GUPTA

J. K.

SHRI

S. K.

SHRI

Alternate)

Ml'fTAL

SHRI V.

Central Public Works Department, New Delhi

PRASAD (

K.

GUPTA (

Alternate) (D)

SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER

(D) III (Alternale)

ExECUTIVE ENGINEER

Central Water Commission ( ERDD ), New Delhi

CMDD ( N& W )

DIRECfOR

DIRECfOR EMBANKMENT (

Central Water and Power Research Station, Pune

SHRI

I. D.

GUPTA

SHRI

S. G.

D-CAD Technologies PVl Ltd, New Delhi

DR K. G.

Delhi College of Engineering, Delhi

DR (

Department of Atomic Energy, Mumbai

SHRI

CHAPHALAKAR (

P. R.

SHRIMATI )

P. C.

Alternate)

RAMANUJAM (

PROF ASHOK JAIN

Department of Eanhquake Engineering, University of Roorkee, Roorkee

DR

S. K. ThAKKAR DR D.K. PAUL (Alernate I ) S.

DR

COL

(DR) SHRI

V. Y.

DR

SHRI

Gammon India Limited, Mumbai

BOSE

KOTESWAR RAO

S.

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Roorkee, Roorkee

Engineers India Ltd, New Delhi

Alternate)

BHATIA

SHRI

Engineer-in-Chief's Branch, Army Headquarters, New Delhi

N&W ) ( Alternate)

BASU (

Alternate II )

SHRI PAL

Y. K.

SINGHAL (

Alternate )

SALPEKAR

R. K.

GROVER (

Alternate )

SHRI S. A. REDDI

Geological Survey of India, Lucknow

SHR]

SHRI

A. K.

CHAITERIEE (

SHRI

V. N.

HAGGADE (

P.

PANDEY

SHRI

Housing Urban and Development Corporation, New Delhi

SHRI

Y. P.

SHARDA (

D. P.

SINGH (

DR S. K. JAlN DR C. V. R.

Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai

DR DR

Alternate )

MURTY (

Alternate)

RAv] SINHA

DR

Indian Meterological Department, New Delhi

Alternate)

V. Roy SHRI

Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Alternate I ) Alternate II )

A.

GOYAL (

Allernale )

S. N .. BHATIACHARYA SHRI V. K. MITrAL ( Alternate)

(Continued on page 38)

37

IS 1893 (Part 1 ) : 2002 (Continued from page 37 ) Organization

Representative( $)

Indian Society of Earthquake Technology, Roorkee

SHRI M. K. GUPTA DR D. K. PAUL ( Alternate)

Larsen and Toubro, Chennai

SHRI K. J AYARAMAN SHRI S. KANAPPAN (Alternate)

Maharashtra Engineering Research Centre ( MERI ), Nasik

SHRI R. L. DAMANI SHRI S. V. KUMARA SWAMY ( Alternate)

Ministry of Surface Transport, New Delhi

SHRI N. K. SINHA SHRI R. S. NINAN ( Alternate)

National Geophysical Research Institute ( CSIR ), Hyderabad

SHRI S. C. BHATIA SHRI M. RAVI KUMAR ( Alternate)

National Highway Authority of India. New Delhi

SHRI N. K. SINHA SHRI G. SHARAN ( Alternate)

National Hydro Electric Power Corporation Ltd, New Delhi

CHIEF ENGINEER, CD-III

National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. New Delhi

SHRI R. S. BAJA] SHRI H. ~. RAMKUMAR ( Alternate)

North Eastern Council, Shillong

SHRI L. K. GANJU SHRI A. D. KHARSHING ( Alternate)

Nuclear Power Corporation, Mumbai

SHRI U. S. P. VERMA

Railway Board, Ministry of Railways, Lucknow

EXECUTIVE DIRECfOR ( B&S ) T DIRECTOR ( B&S ) CB-I ( Alternate)

School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi

SHRI V. ThIRUVENDGADAM

Structural Engineering Research Centre ( CSIR ), Chennai

SHRI C. v. V AIDYANATHAN DR B. SIVARAM SARMA ( Alternate )

Tandon Consultants Ltd, New Delhi

DR MAHESH TANDON SHRI VINAY GUPTA ( Alternate)

Tata Consulting Engineers, Mumbai

SHRI K. V. SUBRAMANIAN SHRI M. K. S. YOGI ( Alternate )

Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehra Dun

SHRI SURINDER KUMAR

In personal capacity ( E-53, Kapil Vihar, Faridabad)

SHRI P. L. NARULA

BIS Directorate General

SHRI S.K. lAIN, Director & Head ( Civ Engg ) [ Representing Director General ( Ex-officio) ]

w

Member-Secretary

SHRI S. CHATURVEDl J oint Director ( Ci v Engg ), BIS

Earthquake Resistant Construction Subcommittee, CED 39 : 1 In personal capacity ( 72/6 Civil Lines, Roorkee 247667 )

DR A. S. ARYA ( Convener)

Building Material Technology Promotion Council, New Delhi

SHRI T. N. GUPTA SHRI J. K. PRASAD ( Alternate)

Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee

SHRI M. P. J AISINGH SHRI V. K. GUPTA ( Alternate)

( Continued on page 39 )

38

IS 1893 (Part 1 ) : 2002 (Continued/rom page 38) Representative( s)

Organization Central Public Works Department, New Delhi

SUPERINTENDING SURVEYOR OF WORKS ( SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER

R.

Delhi College of Engineering, Delhi

DR ( SHRIMATI ) p,

Department of Earthquake Engineering. University of Roorkee, Roorkee

DR

Engineer-in-Chief's Branch, Army Headquarters, New Delhi

EXECUTIVE ENGINeER ( DESIGN )

Housing and Urban Development Corporation, New Delhi

SHRr

S. K.

BosE

THAKKAR

D. K.

DR

NDZ )

(D) ( Alternate)

PAUL (

Alternate )

B. K. CHAKRABORTY D. P. SINGH ( Alternate)

SHRt

M.

Hindustan Prefab Ltd, New Delhi

SHRI

Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai

DR ALOK GOYAL

KUNDU

DR RAvr SINHA (

Alternate )

DR SUDHIR K. JAIN

Indian Institute of Technology. Kanpur

DR C. V. R.

Alternate)

MURTY (

North Eastern Council, Shillong

SHRI

D. N.

Public Works Department, Goverment of Himachal Pradesh. Simla

SHRI

V.

Public Works Department, Goverment of Jammu & Kashmir

SHRf

Public Works Department. GQverment of Assam, Guwahati

SHRI SUBRATA CHAKRAVARTY

Public Works Department, Government of Gujarat, Gandhi Nagar

SUPERINTBNDING ENGINEER ( DESIGN)

Research, Design and Standards Organization, Lucknow

T DIRECTOR STDS

GHOSAI

KAPUR

V. K.

SHRI

G. M.

KAPOOR (

Alternate)

SHOUNTHU

(B&S)/CB-I B&S )/CB-II

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR STDS (

( Alternate ) Structural Engineering Research Centre ( CSIR ), Chennai

C. V. V AIDYANATHAN

SHR!

B.

SHRI

Tandon Consultants Pvt Ltd, Delhi

SIVARAMA SARMA (

Alternate)

DR MAHESH TANDON

SHR! VINAY GUPTA (

Alternate)

Maps Subcommittee, CED 39: 4 In personal capacity ( E-53 Kapil Vihar, Faridabad )

SHRl

Central Water and Power Research Station. Pune

P. L.

NARULA (

BRIG

K. K.

Co""ener ) Alternate)

GUPTA (

DIREC'fOR SHRI

Department of Earthquake Engineering, University of Roorkee, Roorkee

DR

Indian Meterological Department, New Delhi

DR

S.

1. D.

GUPTA (

Alternate)

BASU

DR ASHWANI KUMAR (

S. N. SHRI

Alternate)

BHATTACHARYA

V. K.

MmAL (

Alternate)

Institute of Petroleum Engineering Oil and Natural Gas Commission, Dehra Dun

DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER

National Geophysical Research Institute ( CSIR ). Hyderabad

SHRI

SUPERINTENDING GEOPHYSICIST (

S. C. BHATIA B. K. RASTOGI (Alternate)

DR

Survey of India, Dehra Dun

SHRI

39

G, M.

LAL

Alternate )

Bureau of Indian Standards BIS is a statutory institution established under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 to promote harmonious development of the activities of standardization, marking and quality certification of goods and attending to connected matters in the country.

Copyright B IS has the copyright of all its publications. No part ofthese publications may be reproduced in any form without the prior permission in writing of BIS. This does not preclude the free use, in the course of implementing the standard, of necessary details, such as symbols and sizes, type or grade designations. Enquiries relating to copyright be addressed to the Director (Publications), BIS.

Review of Indian Standards Amendments are issued to standards as the need arises on the basis of comments. Standards are also reviewed periodically; a standard along with amendments is reaffirmed when such review indicates that no changes are needed; if the review indicates that changes are needed, it is taken up for revision. s of Indian Standards should ascertain that they are in possession of the latest amendments or edition by referring to the latest issue of 'BIS Catalogue' and 'Standards: Monthly Additions'. This Indian Standard has been developed from Doc: No. CED 39 (5341 ). Amendments Issued Since Publication Amend No.

Text Affected

Date of Issue

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS Headquarters: Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110002 Telephones: 323 01 31,3233375,3239402

Telegrams: Manaksanstha ( Common to all offices)

Regional Offices:

Telephone

Central: Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg NEW DELHI 110002

3237617 { 3233841

Eastern: 1114 C. 1. T. Scheme VII M, V. 1. P. Road, Kankurgachi KOLKATA 700054

{

3378499,3378561 3378626,3379120

sea 335-336, Sector 34-A, CHANDIGARH 160022

603843 { 602025

Southern: C. I. T. Campus, IV Cross Road, CHENN AI 600 113

2541216,2541442 { 2542519,25413 15

Western: Manakalaya, E9 MIDe, Marol, Andheri (East)

8329295,8327858 { 8327891,8327892

Northern:

MUMBAI 400 093

Branches: AHMADABAD. BANGALORE. BHOPAL. BHUBANESHWAR. COIMBATORE. FARIDABAD. GHAZIABAD. GUWAHATI. HYDERABAD. JAIPUR. KANPUR. LUCKNOW. NAGPUR. NALAGARH.PATNA. PUNE. RAJKOT. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. Printed at New India Printing Press, Khurja., India'

AMENDMENT NO. 1 JANUARY 2005

TO IS 1893 (PART 1) : 2002 CRITERIA FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN OF STRUCTURES PART 1

GENERAL PROVISIONS AND BUILDINGS ( Fifth Revision)

( Page 5, Fig. 1 ) - Interchange 'YARANASI' and' ALLAHABAD' and

'KOLKATA'

to be in Zone III .

( Page 15, under Note 4, Table 1 ) - For Zone II, substitute the following for the existing:

( Page 24, clause 7.6.2 ) -

Substitute the following for the existing

expreSS10n: O.09h

Ta=

[d

( Page 25, clause 7.8.. 4.4 ) expresston: Pij

=

Substitute the following for the existing

( 1 - [32)2 + 4 <; 2 J3 ( 1 + (3)2

( Page 26, clause 7.9.1 ) - Delete last sent.ence 'However ........ neglected'. ( Page 26, clquse 7.9.2 ) -

Renumber 'NOTE' as 'NOTE l' and add the

following Note 2 after Note 1: 'NOTE 2 - In case 3D dynamic analysis is carried out, the dynamic amplification factor of 1.5 be replaced with 1.0.'

( Page 35, Annex E ) - Substitute the following for the existing: , Cuddalore

II

0.24'

(CED 39) Reprography Unit, BIS, New Delhi, India